volquez

On Apr 22, 11:27 pm, "David Short"
<David.No.Sh... RemoveThis @Spam.Wright.Please.Edu> wrote:
> "RJA" <r... RemoveThis @nospam.cinci.rr.com> wrote in message
>
> news:480ea723$0$3366$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
>
> > <spr272... RemoveThis @netzero.net> wrote in message
> >news:38f556e0-3d77-4797-92ec-76182aadfefc@a70g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
> >>I was upset when the reds traded hamilton, but volquez has not given
> >> up more than one run in four starts. he looks to be the real deal.
> >> everyone wants to talk about cueto, but I have yet to see the reds
> >> play this season, who has the better stuff ?
>
> > Honestly, I don't know.  They both look great most of the time.
>
> If you made me chose, I would take Cueto, but they're both very, very
> effective. I think Cueto is a little less reliant on a single pitch than
> volquez is. They're fun, that's for sure.

Also, Cueto has shown much better control. Volquez was wild in Texas,
and has 13 walks this year. On the other hand, he keeps the ball in
the yard - no homers allowed yet, while Cueto has given up five.
Anyway, I'm thrilled the Reds have both