User Name <heitmann DeleteThis @math.utexas.edu> wrote:
> Michael Lanasa wrote:
> > "Eric Margheim" <NOSPAM***ericm@charter.net***NOSPAM> wrote in
> > news:%lvUg.8$J01.7@newsfe04.lga:
> >>"Michael Lanasa" <nospam DeleteThis @nospam.com> wrote in message
> >>news:H86dnbILzvS6xL_YnZ2dnUVZ_rydnZ2d@comcast.com...
> >>
> >>>Post All-Star game numbers:
> >>>Carlos Lee:
> >>>283 AB .358 OBP .512 SLG .870 OPS
> >>>
> >>>Matt Murton:
> >>>207 AB .390 OBP .522 SLG .912 OPS
> >>
> >>What are Jones numbers? If they're going to get Lee it would be
> >>to replace Jones as far as I'm concerned.
> >
> > Jones is signed for 2 more years. Only two teams had interest in
> > Jones when he was a free agent last season, so that contract may be
> > difficult to unload (but not impossible).
>
> He can be released or relegated to the bench. One key point
> to remember is that this offseason the Cubs don't have to
> behave in a consistent conservative way. Showing the fans
> they want to win takes precedence over defending past decisions.
Well, like it or not (or like him or not), Jones put up good (not
great) numbers this year. I've never truly understood the concept that
some posters here advocate about 'selling' a player at 'peak' value
before... at least until this year. If this is not a clear case of it,
I don't know what is.
Jones has likely had his best year ever, but we need more/better
offensive output in the outfield (especially). Some more teams have
*got* to be interested in him after this year, and Hendry may be able
to get some real value for him.
G
--
Chaos Digest: an oasis of information... we think
<http://www.chaosdigest.com/>
>> Stay informed about: Second half numbers