Here we go again....

Seems like another logjam on this reds team. for the past several
years, the reds have been blessed/cursed with too many outfielders
(remember the Dunn/Kearns/Junior/Pena ays, for example). Now, with
Kepp and Gonzalas due back soon, and Hairston playing so well, it
would appear they have a similar situation on the infielder. This is a
tough one to solve. You cant sit Kepp, but you almost have to start
Hairston as well. Phillips is obviously locked at second. So would
anyone be surprised if, by the time Kepp comes off the DL, the Reds
dont send Encarnacion down to Lous.? I think I would rather ride
Hairtson untill he comes back down to earth than keep playing
struggling Edwin.

"DigitalBearcat" <jskiddjr DeleteThis @gmail.com> wrote in message
news:6e591a4e-1367-49d7-950c-c77a8c24978b@y38g2000hsy.googlegroups.com...
> Seems like another logjam on this reds team. for the past several
> years, the reds have been blessed/cursed with too many outfielders
> (remember the Dunn/Kearns/Junior/Pena ays, for example). Now, with
> Kepp and Gonzalas due back soon, and Hairston playing so well, it
> would appear they have a similar situation on the infielder. This is a
> tough one to solve. You cant sit Kepp, but you almost have to start
> Hairston as well. Phillips is obviously locked at second. So would
> anyone be surprised if, by the time Kepp comes off the DL, the Reds
> dont send Encarnacion down to Lous.? I think I would rather ride
> Hairtson untill he comes back down to earth than keep playing
> struggling Edwin.
how about dumping Griffey and playing Hairston in center with Bruce in
right.
Nah - that makes too much sense.
Problem with this team is real. They can't make a common sense decision that
puts the best players on the field. BAker can't make a common sense decision
on the best line-up. This leaves common sense fans to start following hockey
! John