bonds and selig

On Jul 9, 9:36 pm, "Bob-Nob" <bobno... RemoveThis @SPaMol.com> wrote:

> Barry Bonds is too much of a lightning rod for this question
> because, despite the passing of tests, everyone seems convinced
> that he used. Ok, so let's change the player. If we all started
> hearing whispers about David Ortiz and steroids, how would he prove
> that he was not guilty beyond any doubt? People are quick to
> believe that where there's smoke there's fire, and people are
> quick to believe that passing the tests doesn't prove innocence.
> Fine. But how would someone who IS innocent go about to prove
> it once the whispers start?

So...Bonds is a lightning rod, presumably by that you mean for bias,
but you can be TOTALLY objective in your opinion of Ortiz as a Sox
fan? Interesting. Let's turn the tables, why do the whispers start?
Why hasn't Ortiz been the subject of such whispers (in more than a
fleeting sense from Yankees trolls). Perhaps because his personal
trainer wasn't indicted as part of a Federal investigation for
supplying steroids?
 >> Stay informed about: bonds and selig