An old bet approaches the end?

http://tinyurl.com/5lesn5

So, my original assertion was that Pedro would barely win 30 games
over four years with the Mets.

He's got 27 wins right now as a Met, and he's experiencing more delays
in his return for 2008:
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=3347578

Mmmmm ... will he get three wins this year?



BTW, where *is* this Tarkus character now?

In article
<001fb481-b6e7-4bf2-b48a-4e74a6835314 DeleteThis @q24g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
Tonawanda Kardex <tonawandakardex DeleteThis @gmail.com> wrote:

> So, my original assertion was that Pedro would barely win 30 games
> over four years with the Mets.
>
> He's got 27 wins right now as a Met, and he's experiencing more delays
> in his return for 2008:
> http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=3347578
>
> Mmmmm ... will he get three wins this year?
>

You could have some disagreement about what "barely win 30 games" means.
In the given context, I'd be inclined to include up to 32-33 wins as
"barely winning 30", especially considering the kind of hopes the Mets
probably had when they signed Pedro. Do you remember what you meant?

--
Hank Gillette

"It's up to Republicans. They gave us a president who, with all due respect to
fools and idiots, is a fool and an idiot." -- Garrison Keillor