Welcome to BaseballBoardz.com!
FAQFAQ      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log inLog in

baserunning

 
   Baseball Forums (Home) -> California Angels RSS
Next:  Kennedy to the Cards...  
Author Message
Jeanne Douglas

External


Since: Jun 23, 2006
Posts: 687



(Msg. 1) Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2006 3:17 am
Post subject: baserunning
Archived from groups: alt>sports>baseball>calif-angels (more info?)

Somebody posted this on the Cardinals newsgroup; no real surprises here,
but still nice to see:

**************************

Which teams run the bases best?

John Dewan's Stat of the Week
December 6, 2006

In the newest edition of "The Bill James Handbook," Bill James developed
a new system for evaluating baserunning. It's a plus/minus system that,
in essence, tells you how many extra bases (above expected) each player
has gained. For example, on average, baserunners go from first to third
on a single 28% of the time. If an individual does it more often than
that, he scores a positive. Other factors are involved as well and are
fully described in "The Bill James Handbook 2007" pages 291-295.

Here are baseball's five best and five worst baserunners in 2006:

Top Five

Name +/-

1. Chone Figgins +28
2. Chase Utley +27
3. Mark Ellis +24
4. Orlando Cabrera +24
5. David DeJesus +24


Bottom Five

Name +/-

1. Josh Willingham -30
2. Adrian Gonzalez -24
3. Mike Piazza -24
4. Frank Thomas -23
5. Jason Giambi -22

[I don't know how the Molinas avoided being on that list.]

What about from a team perspective? Here are baseball's five best and
five worst baserunning teams in 2006:

Top Five

Team +/-

1. Royals +55
2. Twins +40
3. Angels +22
4. Rangers +21
5. Red Sox +20


Bottom Five

Team +/-

1. Padres -66
2. Giants -30
3. Reds -25
4. CARDINALS -22
5. White Sox -19

A big oof on the Padres there, 36 points behind #2.

Jeanne

--
JD

"...if you think the 'Star Wars' prequels are a disease, then
'Serenity' is the cure."

 >> Stay informed about: baserunning 
Back to top
Login to vote
Nathan Miller

External


Since: Sep 27, 2006
Posts: 49



(Msg. 2) Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2006 6:02 pm
Post subject: Re: baserunning [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Jeanne Douglas" <hlwdjsd DeleteThis @NOSPAMpacbell.net> wrote in message
news:hlwdjsd-4172CD.19170806122006@newsclstr02.news.prodigy.com...
> Somebody posted this on the Cardinals newsgroup; no real surprises here,
> but still nice to see:
>
> **************************
>
> Which teams run the bases best?
>
> John Dewan's Stat of the Week
> December 6, 2006
>
> In the newest edition of "The Bill James Handbook," Bill James developed
> a new system for evaluating baserunning. It's a plus/minus system that,
> in essence, tells you how many extra bases (above expected) each player
> has gained. For example, on average, baserunners go from first to third
> on a single 28% of the time. If an individual does it more often than
> that, he scores a positive. Other factors are involved as well and are
> fully described in "The Bill James Handbook 2007" pages 291-295.
>
> Here are baseball's five best and five worst baserunners in 2006:
>
> Top Five
>
> Name +/-
>
> 1. Chone Figgins +28
> 2. Chase Utley +27
> 3. Mark Ellis +24
> 4. Orlando Cabrera +24
> 5. David DeJesus +24
>
>
> Bottom Five
>
> Name +/-
>
> 1. Josh Willingham -30
> 2. Adrian Gonzalez -24
> 3. Mike Piazza -24
> 4. Frank Thomas -23
> 5. Jason Giambi -22
>
> [I don't know how the Molinas avoided being on that list.]

I don't know how Frank Thomas didn't make last. Did you see him run, or
should I say gimp, last year...it was a joke!

>
> What about from a team perspective? Here are baseball's five best and
> five worst baserunning teams in 2006:
>
> Top Five
>
> Team +/-
>
> 1. Royals +55
> 2. Twins +40
> 3. Angels +22
> 4. Rangers +21
> 5. Red Sox +20
>
>
> Bottom Five
>
> Team +/-
>
> 1. Padres -66
> 2. Giants -30
> 3. Reds -25
> 4. CARDINALS -22
> 5. White Sox -19
>
> A big oof on the Padres there, 36 points behind #2.
>
> Jeanne
>
> --
> JD
>
> "...if you think the 'Star Wars' prequels are a disease, then
> 'Serenity' is the cure."

 >> Stay informed about: baserunning 
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
   Baseball Forums (Home) -> California Angels All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada) (change)
Page 1 of 1

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]