In article <o6uhk5-70l.ln1 DeleteThis @lairds.us>, claird DeleteThis @lairds.us (Cameron Laird)
wrote:
> The question has been thoroughly discussed here and elsewhere.
> Rough answers: no, combining the two is so difficult that it's
> generally doubted Ruth could have kept up his pitching much
> longer.
I don't really remember the discussion here, but it's hard to believe
that Ruth's teams exploited his full value as a pitcher/hitter (that's
ignoring the fact that given Ruth's personality and work habits they
probably didn't exploit his full value as just a hitter).
What if the designated hitter had been in effect at the time? Aside from
the possibility that no one would have even discovered that the Ruth kid
could hit a little, would it have been possible for Ruth to be a DH/P?
Even if he couldn't handle starting every four days, perhaps he could
have been a spot starter.
If a Babe Ruth were playing today, surely a manager like Tony LaRussa
would at least try using him to pitch to left handers. How handy would
it be to have a left-handed relief pitcher that you could bring in for
one or two batters multiple times in a game?
--
Hank Gillette
"Barack Obama is not going to beat Hillary Clinton in a single Democratic
primary. I'll predict that right now." -- William Kristol, 12/17/2006
>> Stay informed about: ala Babe Ruth