 |
|
|
|
Next: The Answer to the Outfield is already in New York
|
| Author |
Message |
External
Since: Feb 17, 2007
Posts: 257
|
(Msg. 1) Posted: Thu Dec 25, 2008 11:54 pm
Post subject: Should the Yankees have waited two more years?
Archived from groups: alt>sports>baseball>ny-yankees (more info?)
|
|
|
Yankees had a great team without Teixeira and getting him was more of
a luxury than a necessity. But in rushing to sign every hot player
this offseason, did the Yankees make a huge blunder? In two short
years Albert Pujols, the best hitter in the game, will be a free
agent. Yankees have Teixeira for the next 9 years and ARod at third
for several more years. Meanwhile by 2011, Redsox can put Youkilis at
third and Pujols at first. The Yankees didn't NEED Teixeira. If they
only showed some caution they could of had Albert Pujols |
|
| Back to top |
|
 | |
External
Since: Dec 26, 2008
Posts: 1
|
(Msg. 2) Posted: Fri Dec 26, 2008 2:17 pm
Post subject: Re: Should the Yankees have waited two more years? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Thu, 25 Dec 2008 23:54:06 -0800 (PST), "blackjet76@aol.com"
wrote:
>Yankees had a great team without Teixeira and getting him was more of
>a luxury than a necessity. But in rushing to sign every hot player
>this offseason, did the Yankees make a huge blunder? In two short
>years Albert Pujols, the best hitter in the game, will be a free
>agent. Yankees have Teixeira for the next 9 years and ARod at third
>for several more years. Meanwhile by 2011, Redsox can put Youkilis at
>third and Pujols at first. The Yankees didn't NEED Teixeira. If they
>only showed some caution they could of had Albert Pujols
Are you serious? Where did you get your info that the Yanks were a
lock on Pujols. How much Christmas joy did you take in yesterday? |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Nov 04, 2008
Posts: 12
|
(Msg. 3) Posted: Fri Dec 26, 2008 6:58 pm
Post subject: Re: Should the Yankees have waited two more years? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"miquel sancho panza" wrote in message
> On Thu, 25 Dec 2008 23:54:06 -0800 (PST), "blackjet76@aol.com"
> wrote:
>
>>Yankees had a great team without Teixeira and getting him was more of
>>a luxury than a necessity. But in rushing to sign every hot player
>>this offseason, did the Yankees make a huge blunder? In two short
>>years Albert Pujols, the best hitter in the game, will be a free
>>agent. Yankees have Teixeira for the next 9 years and ARod at third
>>for several more years. Meanwhile by 2011, Redsox can put Youkilis at
>>third and Pujols at first. The Yankees didn't NEED Teixeira. If they
>>only showed some caution they could of had Albert Pujols
>
> Are you serious? Where did you get your info that the Yanks were a
> lock on Pujols. How much Christmas joy did you take in yesterday?
Why can't the Yankees have Texiera and Pujols both? >> Stay informed about: Should the Yankees have waited two more years? |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Feb 17, 2007
Posts: 257
|
(Msg. 4) Posted: Fri Dec 26, 2008 8:21 pm
Post subject: Re: Should the Yankees have waited two more years? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Dec 26, 7:58 pm, "Jr" wrote:
> "miquel sancho panza" wrote in messagenews:9qlal4197kp551l062880jrgffe68j3j6s@4ax.com...
>
> > On Thu, 25 Dec 2008 23:54:06 -0800 (PST), "blackje...@aol.com"
> > wrote:
>
> >>Yankees had a great team without Teixeira and getting him was more of
> >>a luxury than a necessity. But in rushing to sign every hot player
> >>this offseason, did the Yankees make a huge blunder? In two short
> >>years Albert Pujols, the best hitter in the game, will be a free
> >>agent. Yankees have Teixeira for the next 9 years and ARod at third
> >>for several more years. Meanwhile by 2011, Redsox can put Youkilis at
> >>third and Pujols at first. The Yankees didn't NEED Teixeira. If they
> >>only showed some caution they could of had Albert Pujols
>
> > Are you serious? Where did you get your info that the Yanks were a
> > lock on Pujols. How much Christmas joy did you take in yesterday?
>
> Why can't the Yankees have Texiera and Pujols both?
Where would they put him? Arod and Teixeira at the corners and Jeter
at DH. There's no spot for Pujols >> Stay informed about: Should the Yankees have waited two more years? |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Nov 04, 2008
Posts: 12
|
(Msg. 5) Posted: Fri Dec 26, 2008 11:04 pm
Post subject: Re: Should the Yankees have waited two more years? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
wrote in message
On Dec 26, 7:58 pm, "Jr" wrote:
> "miquel sancho panza" wrote in
> messagenews:9qlal4197kp551l062880jrgffe68j3j6s@4ax.com...
>
> > On Thu, 25 Dec 2008 23:54:06 -0800 (PST), "blackje...@aol.com"
> > wrote:
>
> >>Yankees had a great team without Teixeira and getting him was more of
> >>a luxury than a necessity. But in rushing to sign every hot player
> >>this offseason, did the Yankees make a huge blunder? In two short
> >>years Albert Pujols, the best hitter in the game, will be a free
> >>agent. Yankees have Teixeira for the next 9 years and ARod at third
> >>for several more years. Meanwhile by 2011, Redsox can put Youkilis at
> >>third and Pujols at first. The Yankees didn't NEED Teixeira. If they
> >>only showed some caution they could of had Albert Pujols
>
> > Are you serious? Where did you get your info that the Yanks were a
> > lock on Pujols. How much Christmas joy did you take in yesterday?
>
> Why can't the Yankees have Texiera and Pujols both?
Where would they put him? Arod and Teixeira at the corners and Jeter
at DH. There's no spot for Pujols
While here in Peoria he played SS and RF. >> Stay informed about: Should the Yankees have waited two more years? |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Profile
Private Messages
Log in
