maybe and maybe not... but my over all point is that he isnt the cause of
the problems with the rangers...
the problem starts at the Rangers complete inability to sign any decent
pitchers or even an ace for their squad.. I watched ESPN the other day as I
am still to sick to watch a full game... they hit 5 runs but gave up 6...
thats a classic problem with the rangers... they always give up that one
more run...
I am not arguing that Washington is the answer. I just don't see how it
matters much when our squads pitching always sucks...
"joe dopebucket" <joedopebucket.TakeThisOut@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1180454127.261847.117500@q66g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
> This manager had no background in running a team and with the history
> of the Rangers pitching it was unfair to expect this manager to
> succeed.There have been cases of experianced managers having success
> with less than quality pitching but in those cases there was usually
> outstanding defense (supposed to be a staple of Washington's) and
> patient but timely hitting (something else Washington harped on when
> he was hired).That being said,this team is going to lose 100 games and
> will have taken another huge step backwards because Washington just
> does not have the experiance to guide a team with patchwork pitching
> and from the way it looks he seems to not have a lot to bring to the
> table anywhere.
> >> Stay informed about: Why Washington should have never been hired