Welcome to BaseballBoardz.com!
FAQFAQ      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log inLog in

Tim Lincecum...not bad

 
   Baseball Forums (Home) -> San Francisco Giants RSS
Next:  The whole league is juiced  
Author Message
Paul Lujan

External


Since: Aug 25, 2003
Posts: 190



(Msg. 1) Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2006 5:55 pm
Post subject: Tim Lincecum...not bad
Archived from groups: alt>sports>baseball>sf-giants (more info?)

Not a bad selection at all, given some of the nobodies they were talking
about picking at #10.

Lincecum was projected to be a top-5 pick and there was even some talk
(when it looked like the Royals would be stupid) that he could go #1, so
that's definitely a point in his favor. On the other hand, he is an
undersized righty, which always worries scouts, and he has been overworked
at Washington.

Still, a good pick.

--Paul

 >> Stay informed about: Tim Lincecum...not bad 
Back to top
Login to vote
Ah...I'm not really here

External


Since: Dec 29, 2006
Posts: 89



(Msg. 2) Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2006 5:55 pm
Post subject: Re: Tim Lincecum...not bad [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Francisco L. Sibal" <fsibal.RemoveThis@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1149620000.760579.277750@f6g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> I wonder if you get a Roy Oswalt when you're hoping for a Roy Oswalt?
>
> Based on stats, I agree Lincecum feels like a solid pick who, barring
> injuries, will at least see time in the majors. Then again, so did
> David Aardsma...

Speaking of Aardsma, I noticed he's back up with the Cubs again, but
still giving up tons of runs. They must have some sorry ass triple A
pitchers...

 >> Stay informed about: Tim Lincecum...not bad 
Back to top
Login to vote
TheDaveŠ

External


Since: Apr 07, 2006
Posts: 355



(Msg. 3) Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2006 7:49 pm
Post subject: Re: Tim Lincecum...not bad [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

> Paul Lujan wrote:
> Not a bad selection at all, given some of the nobodies they were
> talking about picking at #10.
>
> Lincecum was projected to be a top-5 pick and there was even some
> talk (when it looked like the Royals would be stupid) that he could
> go #1, so that's definitely a point in his favor. On the other hand,
> he is an undersized righty, which always worries scouts, and he has
> been overworked at Washington.
>
> Still, a good pick.

Sabean needs trade bait for July. :-p (sorry, couldn't resist)
 >> Stay informed about: Tim Lincecum...not bad 
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
   Baseball Forums (Home) -> San Francisco Giants All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada) (change)
Page 1 of 1

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]