 |
|
|
|
Next: CWS has reached the next level !
|
| Author |
Message |
External
Since: May 18, 2006
Posts: 62
|
(Msg. 1) Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2003 2:19 am
Post subject: Why Stanford Sucks
Archived from groups: rec>sport>baseball>college, others (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 | |
External
Since: Jun 24, 2003
Posts: 13
|
(Msg. 2) Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2003 2:19 am
Post subject: Re: Why Stanford Sucks [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Chris Bellomy <puevf RemoveThis @tbbqfubj.arg.invalid> wrote in message news:<0t3ef7b4edidbdn64 RemoveThis @redshark.goodshow.net>...
> In all the years of the College World Series, only one team ever
> has lost THREE games.
This is another example of the NCAA's blatant favoritism toward
Stanford. Everyone else was eliminated after only two losses.
Actually, it could have been worse. Has Stanford won game 3 of
the championship series, everyone in the tournament would've had two
losses and been eliminated, and there'd be no champion at all, sort of
like Division I-A football. Who would the polls have picked as #1?
Jonathan Sadow
jonsadow RemoveThis @yahoo.com
The William Marsh Rice University
The Eternal Southwest Conference Champion
The 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002 and 2003 Western Athletic
Conference Baseball Champion
The 2001, 2002 and 2003 Houston Regional Champion
The 2002 and 2003 Houston Superregional Champion
The 2003 NCAA Division I College World Series Champion
The academic flagship of the Western Athletic Conference
The highest student-athlete graduation rate in NCAA Division I-A
The highest-ranked U.S. News & World Report Tier 1 school in Texas
The future home of the George W. Bush Presidential Library
"The 67-year-old [Wayne] Graham has crafted the best college sports
program in the state of Texas at a university where athletics are
supposed to be totally subservient to the Ivy League-caliber
academics." - Dale Robertson, Houston Chronicle, March 20, 2003 |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jun 27, 2003
Posts: 8
|
(Msg. 3) Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2003 5:05 am
Post subject: Re: Why Stanford Sucks [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On 6/23/03 7:19 PM, in article 0t3ef7b4edidbdn64.RemoveThis@redshark.goodshow.net,
"Chris Bellomy" <puevf.RemoveThis@tbbqfubj.arg.invalid> contributed to the U.S.
Constitution in the midst of saying:
> In all the years of the College World Series, only one team ever
> has lost THREE games.
Orig. >> Stay informed about: Why Stanford Sucks |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jun 24, 2003
Posts: 3
|
(Msg. 4) Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2003 5:49 pm
Post subject: Re: Why Stanford Sucks [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
How much alcohol caused Chris Bellomy <puevf.RemoveThis@tbbqfubj.arg.invalid> to write:
: In all the years of the College World Series, only one team ever
: has lost THREE games.
YM "why ask why"
-joseph >> Stay informed about: Why Stanford Sucks |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jun 27, 2003
Posts: 8
|
(Msg. 5) Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2003 6:52 pm
Post subject: Re: Why Stanford Sucks [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On 6/24/03 12:40 AM, in article
b9060a68.0306232340.1876afee.DeleteThis@posting.google.com, "Jonathan Sadow"
<jonsadow.DeleteThis@yahoo.com> contributed to the U.S. Constitution in the midst of
saying:
> Chris Bellomy <puevf.DeleteThis@tbbqfubj.arg.invalid> wrote in message
> news:<0t3ef7b4edidbdn64.DeleteThis@redshark.goodshow.net>...
>> In all the years of the College World Series, only one team ever
>> has lost THREE games.
>
> This is another example of the NCAA's blatant favoritism toward
> Stanford. Everyone else was eliminated after only two losses.
>
> Actually, it could have been worse. Has Stanford won game 3 of
> the championship series, everyone in the tournament would've had two
> losses and been eliminated, and there'd be no champion at all, sort of
> like Division I-A football. Who would the polls have picked as #1?
Florida State. >> Stay informed about: Why Stanford Sucks |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jun 24, 2003
Posts: 6
|
(Msg. 6) Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2003 6:52 pm
Post subject: Re: Why Stanford Sucks [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Tonawanda Kardex wrote:
> On 6/24/03 12:40 AM, in article
> b9060a68.0306232340.1876afee RemoveThis @posting.google.com, "Jonathan Sadow"
> <jonsadow RemoveThis @yahoo.com> contributed to the U.S. Constitution in the midst of
> saying:
>
>
>>Chris Bellomy <puevf RemoveThis @tbbqfubj.arg.invalid> wrote in message
>>news:<0t3ef7b4edidbdn64 RemoveThis @redshark.goodshow.net>...
>>
>>>In all the years of the College World Series, only one team ever
>>>has lost THREE games.
>>>
>> This is another example of the NCAA's blatant favoritism toward
>>Stanford. Everyone else was eliminated after only two losses.
>>
>> Actually, it could have been worse. Has Stanford won game 3 of
>>the championship series, everyone in the tournament would've had two
>>losses and been eliminated, and there'd be no champion at all, sort of
>>like Division I-A football. Who would the polls have picked as #1?
>>
>
> Florida State.
Baseball America would have picked Georgia Tech.
GT >> Stay informed about: Why Stanford Sucks |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Aug 13, 2003
Posts: 31
|
(Msg. 7) Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2003 1:38 am
Post subject: Re: Why Stanford Sucks [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Tue, 24 Jun 2003 15:00:29 -0500, Glenn Tanner
<gt10 RemoveThis @blahblahblahblah.com> wrote:
>Tonawanda Kardex wrote:
>
>> On 6/24/03 12:40 AM, in article
>> b9060a68.0306232340.1876afee RemoveThis @posting.google.com, "Jonathan Sadow"
>> <jonsadow RemoveThis @yahoo.com> contributed to the U.S. Constitution in the midst of
>> saying:
>>
>>
>>>Chris Bellomy <puevf RemoveThis @tbbqfubj.arg.invalid> wrote in message
>>>news:<0t3ef7b4edidbdn64 RemoveThis @redshark.goodshow.net>...
>>>
>>>>In all the years of the College World Series, only one team ever
>>>>has lost THREE games.
>>>>
>>> This is another example of the NCAA's blatant favoritism toward
>>>Stanford. Everyone else was eliminated after only two losses.
>>>
>>> Actually, it could have been worse. Has Stanford won game 3 of
>>>the championship series, everyone in the tournament would've had two
>>>losses and been eliminated, and there'd be no champion at all, sort of
>>>like Division I-A football. Who would the polls have picked as #1?
>>>
>>
>> Florida State.
>
>
>Baseball America would have picked Georgia Tech.
John Manuel as much as admitted this when he appeared on the
Stanford student radio station during one of the CWS games.
- Tony
--
Tony Lima /"\ ASCII ribbon campaign
\ / against HTML mail
X and postings
/ \ >> Stay informed about: Why Stanford Sucks |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ
Profile
Private Messages
Log in
