Sign stealing

On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 03:17:43 GMT, "t-bone" <thomashagen DeleteThis @sbcglobal.net>
wrote:

>Anyone think that McCarthy's fine showing tonight was watched by
>Cincinnati's scouts?

Oh, no doubt they did if the trade isn't already dead in the water.

That the trade hasn't happened yet makes me wonder if junior didn't
just say no. He has a -no trade- clause in his contract. It's either
that or the Reds won't eat enough of the contract. Those are the only
two things that make sense as this trade is a no-brainer on both sides
otherwise.
 >> Stay informed about: Sign stealing 

"JustForFun" <justforfun69 RemoveThis @bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:pbkah1tsrrcpbj8urk6vu16oltibbv5ir2@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 03:17:43 GMT, "t-bone" <thomashagen RemoveThis @sbcglobal.net>
> wrote:
>
>>Anyone think that McCarthy's fine showing tonight was watched by
>>Cincinnati's scouts?
>
> Oh, no doubt they did if the trade isn't already dead in the water.
>
> That the trade hasn't happened yet makes me wonder if junior didn't
> just say no. He has a -no trade- clause in his contract. It's either
> that or the Reds won't eat enough of the contract. Those are the only
> two things that make sense as this trade is a no-brainer on both sides
> otherwise.

I guess it's moreso about whether the Reds want to swallow a chunk of that
contract even though the White Sox have shown that they can still hit. As
far as today went, I was satisfied with the split because even though they
reported 29,000 in Texas - it seemed like Wrigley Field back in the early -
mid sixties as far as the crowd seemed. I get a sense that the White Sox
thrive on big attendance to make them play tighter because anything that's
been hurting them recently has been their fielding...
 >> Stay informed about: Sign stealing