Welcome to BaseballBoardz.com!
FAQFAQ   SearchSearch      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log inLog in

Retired #'s

 
Goto page Previous  1, 2
   Baseball Forums (Home) -> Montreal Expos RSS
Next:  Au revoir  
Author Message
Brent McKee

External


Since: Jan 20, 2005
Posts: 12



(Msg. 16) Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:05 pm
Post subject: Re: Retired #'s [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: alt>sports>baseball>montreal-expos (more info?)

"John C. Baker" <jcb10.TakeThisOut@axe.humboldt.edu> wrote in message
news:jcb10-4A3175.14085703102004@reader3.news.rcn.net...
> In article <c1mol0p6kj4tegsa3gfaj26jd4aig8aua7.TakeThisOut@4ax.com>,
> Robertazimmerman <bobdylan.TakeThisOut@iname.com> wrote:
>
>> When teams move, do the new owners/cities respect the previously
>> retired numbers?
>
> The Giants still have their NY numbers retired, but then again, they
> remained the "Giants" and didn't become the "Twins" or "Orioles" (i.e.,
> they didn't try to reinvent thier identity when they moved).

Serious question -- did the Senators (old) or the Browns have any numbers
worth retiring? I'm asking this because it seems to me that the only player
on the Browns who might qualify was George Sisler who left St Louis in 1927.
As for he Senators about the only one who would seem to qualify might be
Heinie Manush. Numbers weren't introduced permanently until 1929 and
weren't used by all teams until 1932, meaning that a truly great player like
Walter Johnson didn't have a number to retire.

--
Brent McKee

To reply by email, please remove the capital letters (S and N) from
the email address

"If we cease to judge this world, we may find ourselves, very quickly,
in one which is infinitely worse."
- Margaret Atwood

"Nothing is more dangerous than a dogmatic worldview - nothing more
constraining, more blinding to innovation, more destructive of
openness to novelty. "
- Stephen Jay Gould (1941-2002)

 >> Stay informed about: Retired #'s 
Back to top
Login to vote
FSogol

External


Since: Oct 01, 2004
Posts: 23



(Msg. 17) Posted: Tue Oct 05, 2004 9:44 am
Post subject: Re: Retired #'s [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Brent McKee wrote:

>
> Serious question -- did the Senators (old) or the Browns have any numbers
> worth retiring? I'm asking this because it seems to me that the only player
> on the Browns who might qualify was George Sisler who left St Louis in 1927.
> As for he Senators about the only one who would seem to qualify might be
> Heinie Manush. Numbers weren't introduced permanently until 1929 and
> weren't used by all teams until 1932, meaning that a truly great player like
> Walter Johnson didn't have a number to retire.

Had the team hung around, they probably would have gotten around to
retiring the numbers for Joe Judge and Frank Howard.

--
FSogol

 >> Stay informed about: Retired #'s 
Back to top
Login to vote
Robertazimmerman

External


Since: Oct 25, 2003
Posts: 79



(Msg. 18) Posted: Tue Oct 05, 2004 10:23 am
Post subject: Re: Retired #'s - a proper answer [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On 4 Oct 2004 13:16:19 -0700, ventman.DeleteThis@earthlink.net (Anthony V) wrote:

>Reese, Campanella, and Robinson only played in Brooklyn. The others
>played for the Brooklyn Dodgers at some point. Their retired numbers
>still stand
>
>Spahn was a Boston and Milwaukee Brave, Mathews was all three cities
>(the only such person), and Aaron was Milwaukee and Atlanta Braves.
>THeir numbers stand. There are other solely Atlanta Brave retirees
>
>Harmon Killebrew was a Senator for 7 years. His number is retired
>Walter Johnson did not wear a uniform number in his day (pre 1936)
>

So hopefully, The Kid, the Hawk and Le Grand Orange will not have
their two (!) numbers used by any future members of this franchise.

Roberta
 >> Stay informed about: Retired #'s 
Back to top
Login to vote
Jack Bagley

External


Since: Jan 18, 2005
Posts: 2



(Msg. 19) Posted: Sat Dec 18, 2004 4:34 am
Post subject: Re: Retired #'s [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Adam" <adam.crowson DeleteThis @gmail.com> wrote in message
news:53bfa72d.0410011028.259f5454@posting.google.com...
> The answer is yes and no...kind of. As far as the Dodgers go, I would
> guess there were some retired numbers but I've never seen those
> numbers posted at Dodger Stadium. The Braves have retired
> numbers...Warren Spahn. The Senators, however, do not. Walter Johnson
> would have certainly retired his number with the Senators, but when
> they moved to Minnesota in 1960, Johnson's number is not at the
> Metrodome...HOWEVER, the Twins had a Walter Johnson bobblehead
> giveaway night this season.
>
>

I realize I'm very late in this discussion, but ... Walter Johnson never
wore a uniform number. In fact, until 1929, no MLB player (except the
Cleveland Indians for one month in 1923 and the St. Louis Cardinals for
about a month in 1925) wore a number. The first numbered team for an entire
season was the New York Yankees in 1929. Many teams began wearing numbers
that year, but the Yankees were the first on the field -- and their
opponents that first day weren't wearing numbers. (I think it was the
Philadelphia A's, who didn't begin wearing numbers on the home uniforms
until 1934 -- though they did start with them on the road jerseys in 1931.)

As for the original question ... the Dodgers and Giants retained uniform
numbers that had been retired when the teams left their original cities, and
those numbers remain retired. The Braves did not retire any numbers until
either just before or just after their arrival in Atlanta, and Warren
Spahn's 21 was the first number so honored. Other teams that moved (the
Browns to Baltimore, the original Senators to Minnesota, the expansion
Senators to Texas, the A's to Kansas City and then to Oakland) didn't have
any retired numbers when the moves took place.

Jack
 >> Stay informed about: Retired #'s 
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
   Baseball Forums (Home) -> Montreal Expos All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada) (change)
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]