 |
|
|
|
Next: Game Saturday?
|
| Author |
Message |
External
Since: Jan 14, 2005
Posts: 270
|
(Msg. 1) Posted: Sun Apr 18, 2004 10:15 am
Post subject: The RF Watch.
Archived from groups: alt>sports>baseball>atlanta-braves (more info?)
|
|
|
Let's see how the Mets acquisitions are doing compare to the other RFers
available in FA this past off season:
Avg Obp Slg Ab Hr Rbi
K Garcia .296 .321 .481 27 1 5
J Gonzalez .295 .333 .568 44 3 5
Guerrero .292 .370 .625 48 4 10
Spencer .290 .333 .387 31 0 3
J Guillen .267 .353 .333 45 0 5
Sheffield .237 .356 .421 38 1 8
Ibañez .235 .341 .353 34 0 4
Encarnacion .220 .273 .366 41 1 6
Did I missed somebody? Let's trade Garcia/Spencer for Guerrero!!! 
We'll check back later on during the season.
--
Let's Go Mets!!!
Met-in-PR |
|
| Back to top |
|
 | |
External
Since: Dec 13, 2003
Posts: 84
|
(Msg. 2) Posted: Sun Apr 18, 2004 10:15 am
Post subject: Re: The RF Watch. [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Sun, 18 Apr 2004 10:15:16 -0500, "Met-in-PR" <orb.RemoveThis@prtc.net> wrote:
>Let's see how the Mets acquisitions are doing compare to the other RFers
>available in FA this past off season:
>
> Avg Obp Slg Ab Hr Rbi
>K Garcia .296 .321 .481 27 1 5
>J Gonzalez .295 .333 .568 44 3 5
>Guerrero .292 .370 .625 48 4 10
>Spencer .290 .333 .387 31 0 3
>J Guillen .267 .353 .333 45 0 5
>Sheffield .237 .356 .421 38 1 8
>Ibañez .235 .341 .353 34 0 4
>Encarnacion .220 .273 .366 41 1 6
In order of OPS, plus Drew:
BA OBP SLG OPS
Guerrero .292 .370 .625 .995
J Gonzalez .295 .333 .568 .901
K Garcia .296 .321 .481 .802
Sheffield .237 .356 .421 .777
Spencer .290 .333 .387 .720
Ibañez .235 .341 .353 .694
J Guillen .267 .353 .333 .686
Drew .185 .353 .333 .686
Encarnacion .220 .273 .366 .639
Who knew that Drew has already been on based 12 times this season?
Sure seems like less... |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Oct 03, 2003
Posts: 2088
|
(Msg. 3) Posted: Sun Apr 18, 2004 10:18 am
Post subject: Re: The RF Watch. [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"mwt" <mwt1975.DeleteThis@yahoo.com> wrote
> Who knew that Drew has already been on based 12 times this season?
> Sure seems like less...
I was barely aware he'd been tot he plate 12 times this season.
Colin >> Stay informed about: The RF Watch. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jun 29, 2003
Posts: 239
|
(Msg. 4) Posted: Sun Apr 18, 2004 10:35 am
Post subject: Re: The RF Watch. [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Sun, 18 Apr 2004 10:15:16 -0500, "Met-in-PR" <orb DeleteThis @prtc.net> wrote:
>Let's see how the Mets acquisitions are doing compare to the other RFers
>available in FA this past off season:
>
> Avg Obp Slg Ab Hr Rbi
>K Garcia .296 .321 .481 27 1 5
>J Gonzalez .295 .333 .568 44 3 5
>Guerrero .292 .370 .625 48 4 10
>Spencer .290 .333 .387 31 0 3
>J Guillen .267 .353 .333 45 0 5
>Sheffield .237 .356 .421 38 1 8
>Ibañez .235 .341 .353 34 0 4
>Encarnacion .220 .273 .366 41 1 6
>
>
>Did I missed somebody? Let's trade Garcia/Spencer for Guerrero!!!
>We'll check back later on during the season.
the mets newsgroup is two clicks northeast, buddy.
s/
*****
"I'll tell you this: QuesTec had nothing to do with it. It wasn't the balls
I was throwing outside of QuesTec. It was the balls I was throwing inside
of QuesTec. I didn't pitch good." -- Greg Maddux on his 2003 season >> Stay informed about: The RF Watch. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Aug 08, 2004
Posts: 182
|
(Msg. 5) Posted: Sun Apr 18, 2004 10:51 am
Post subject: Re: The RF Watch. [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Sam Hutcheson wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Apr 2004 10:15:16 -0500, "Met-in-PR" <orb.TakeThisOut@prtc.net> wrote:
>
>
>>Let's see how the Mets acquisitions are doing compare to the other RFers
>>available in FA this past off season:
>>
>> Avg Obp Slg Ab Hr Rbi
>>K Garcia .296 .321 .481 27 1 5
>>J Gonzalez .295 .333 .568 44 3 5
>>Guerrero .292 .370 .625 48 4 10
>>Spencer .290 .333 .387 31 0 3
>>J Guillen .267 .353 .333 45 0 5
>>Sheffield .237 .356 .421 38 1 8
>>Ibañez .235 .341 .353 34 0 4
>>Encarnacion .220 .273 .366 41 1 6
>>
>>
>>Did I missed somebody? Let's trade Garcia/Spencer for Guerrero!!!
>>We'll check back later on during the season.
>
>
> the mets newsgroup is two clicks northeast, buddy.
>
and he seems to have missed drew.
dick
-- as do the braves >> Stay informed about: The RF Watch. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jun 03, 2006
Posts: 988
|
(Msg. 6) Posted: Sun Apr 18, 2004 9:34 pm
Post subject: Re: The RF Watch. [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
In article <c5u4kh$5qj9t$1@ID-109339.news.uni-berlin.de>,
drjamessidbury.RemoveThis@hotmail.com says...
> Sam Hutcheson wrote:
> > On Sun, 18 Apr 2004 10:15:16 -0500, "Met-in-PR" <orb.RemoveThis@prtc.net> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Let's see how the Mets acquisitions are doing compare to the other RFers
> >>available in FA this past off season:
> >>
> >> Avg Obp Slg Ab Hr Rbi
> >>K Garcia .296 .321 .481 27 1 5
> >>J Gonzalez .295 .333 .568 44 3 5
> >>Guerrero .292 .370 .625 48 4 10
> >>Spencer .290 .333 .387 31 0 3
> >>J Guillen .267 .353 .333 45 0 5
> >>Sheffield .237 .356 .421 38 1 8
> >>Ibañez .235 .341 .353 34 0 4
> >>Encarnacion .220 .273 .366 41 1 6
> >
> > the mets newsgroup is two clicks northeast, buddy.
>
> and he seems to have missed drew.
Was a trade, not a free agent.
--
Cranial Crusader dgh 1138 at bell south point net >> Stay informed about: The RF Watch. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Dec 13, 2003
Posts: 84
|
(Msg. 7) Posted: Sun Apr 18, 2004 9:41 pm
Post subject: Re: The RF Watch. [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Sun, 18 Apr 2004 21:34:04 -0500, Dale Hicks <dgh1138.RemoveThis@yahoo.com>
wrote:
>In article <c5u4kh$5qj9t$1@ID-109339.news.uni-berlin.de>,
>drjamessidbury@hotmail.com says...
>> Sam Hutcheson wrote:
>> > On Sun, 18 Apr 2004 10:15:16 -0500, "Met-in-PR" <orb.RemoveThis@prtc.net> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >>Let's see how the Mets acquisitions are doing compare to the other RFers
>> >>available in FA this past off season:
>> >>
>> >> Avg Obp Slg Ab Hr Rbi
>> >>K Garcia .296 .321 .481 27 1 5
>> >>J Gonzalez .295 .333 .568 44 3 5
>> >>Guerrero .292 .370 .625 48 4 10
>> >>Spencer .290 .333 .387 31 0 3
>> >>J Guillen .267 .353 .333 45 0 5
>> >>Sheffield .237 .356 .421 38 1 8
>> >>Ibañez .235 .341 .353 34 0 4
>> >>Encarnacion .220 .273 .366 41 1 6
>> >
>> > the mets newsgroup is two clicks northeast, buddy.
>>
>> and he seems to have missed drew.
>
>Was a trade, not a free agent.
Neither was Encarnacion. His post referred to *available* players.
Drew was being shopped around, so he could definitely be considered
"available." >> Stay informed about: The RF Watch. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Oct 03, 2003
Posts: 297
|
(Msg. 8) Posted: Sun Apr 18, 2004 11:56 pm
Post subject: Re: The RF Watch. [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"mwt" <mwt1975 RemoveThis @yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:02f68014gmdra22agb6s6igu54kma8ru0d@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 18 Apr 2004 21:34:04 -0500, Dale Hicks <dgh1138 RemoveThis @yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
> >In article <c5u4kh$5qj9t$1@ID-109339.news.uni-berlin.de>,
> >drjamessidbury@hotmail.com says...
> >> Sam Hutcheson wrote:
> >> > On Sun, 18 Apr 2004 10:15:16 -0500, "Met-in-PR" <orb RemoveThis @prtc.net> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >>Let's see how the Mets acquisitions are doing compare to the other
RFers
> >> >>available in FA this past off season:
> >> >>
> >> >> Avg Obp Slg Ab Hr Rbi
> >> >>K Garcia .296 .321 .481 27 1 5
> >> >>J Gonzalez .295 .333 .568 44 3 5
> >> >>Guerrero .292 .370 .625 48 4 10
> >> >>Spencer .290 .333 .387 31 0 3
> >> >>J Guillen .267 .353 .333 45 0 5
> >> >>Sheffield .237 .356 .421 38 1 8
> >> >>Ibañez .235 .341 .353 34 0 4
> >> >>Encarnacion .220 .273 .366 41 1 6
> >> >
> >> > the mets newsgroup is two clicks northeast, buddy.
> >>
> >> and he seems to have missed drew.
> >
> >Was a trade, not a free agent.
>
> Neither was Encarnacion. His post referred to *available* players.
> Drew was being shopped around, so he could definitely be considered
> "available."
Wasn't Encarnacion non-tendered and then signed by the Dodgers, after they
traded for him? If so, he's technically right...
Jon
- Marry me, Mike Fisher...
--
****************************
"That's outrageous. God didn't create stupid people. When you go on the air
and say something like that, I've got to think Andy Van Slyke was born to be
an idiot."
-Julio Franco >> Stay informed about: The RF Watch. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Dec 13, 2003
Posts: 84
|
(Msg. 9) Posted: Sun Apr 18, 2004 11:56 pm
Post subject: Re: The RF Watch. [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Sun, 18 Apr 2004 23:56:07 -0300, "Jon Richardson"
<jonrichardson.DeleteThis@rogers.com> wrote:
>"mwt" <mwt1975.DeleteThis@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:02f68014gmdra22agb6s6igu54kma8ru0d@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 18 Apr 2004 21:34:04 -0500, Dale Hicks <dgh1138.DeleteThis@yahoo.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >In article <c5u4kh$5qj9t$1@ID-109339.news.uni-berlin.de>,
>> >drjamessidbury@hotmail.com says...
>> >> Sam Hutcheson wrote:
>> >> > On Sun, 18 Apr 2004 10:15:16 -0500, "Met-in-PR" <orb.DeleteThis@prtc.net> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >>Let's see how the Mets acquisitions are doing compare to the other
>RFers
>> >> >>available in FA this past off season:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Avg Obp Slg Ab Hr Rbi
>> >> >>K Garcia .296 .321 .481 27 1 5
>> >> >>J Gonzalez .295 .333 .568 44 3 5
>> >> >>Guerrero .292 .370 .625 48 4 10
>> >> >>Spencer .290 .333 .387 31 0 3
>> >> >>J Guillen .267 .353 .333 45 0 5
>> >> >>Sheffield .237 .356 .421 38 1 8
>> >> >>Ibañez .235 .341 .353 34 0 4
>> >> >>Encarnacion .220 .273 .366 41 1 6
>> >> >
>> >> > the mets newsgroup is two clicks northeast, buddy.
>> >>
>> >> and he seems to have missed drew.
>> >
>> >Was a trade, not a free agent.
>>
>> Neither was Encarnacion. His post referred to *available* players.
>> Drew was being shopped around, so he could definitely be considered
>> "available."
>
>Wasn't Encarnacion non-tendered and then signed by the Dodgers, after they
>traded for him? If so, he's technically right...
I see that you're right. I also notice that I missed the original
poster's statement "available *in FA*". So this is actually my
mistake. >> Stay informed about: The RF Watch. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ
Profile
Private Messages
Log in
