"Dale Hicks" <dgh1138.TakeThisOut@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:2oqmvuFdechuU5@uni-berlin.de...
> In article <o7sfi0pdodbalsj3tea28p687l3bk24pmk.TakeThisOut@4ax.com>,
> akrasian.TakeThisOut@nospam.hotmail.com says...
> > On Sun, 22 Aug 2004 00:14:46 GMT, "Chuck Hildebrandt"
> > <mcmlxi.TakeThisOut@enteract.com> wrote:
> >
> > >What team is ranked #1 in Productive Out percentage? The Montreal
Expos.
> > >
> > >What team is ranked #2 in Productive Out percentage? The Pittsburgh
> > >Pirates.
> > >
> > >Are you gonna tell me these are good teams?
> >
> > More relevant than whether they are good teams, is that Montreal is
> > dead last in the league in scoring. Pittsburgh is 12th in the NL in
> > scoring. It doesn't say much for the importance of Productive Outs,
> > that they don't seem to help teams to actually score.
>
> I played around with this using the ASS software, and came up with the
> same results. Using four years' data (1999-2002) and the definition
> from that infamous article, I got:
>
> Correlation with Winning Percentage: 0.0997
> Correlation with Runs Scored: 0.1172
>
Well, like I always say, there's nothing like a good piece of ASS software
to bring perspective to the discussion.
>> Stay informed about: I Can *Prove* The Productive Out Is A Stupid Statistic