Where did Paulson come up with $700 Billion?

On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 06:53:54 -0400, "Tom Gardner" <tom.TakeThisOut@ohiobrush.com>
wrote:

>
>"Ken" <wh.TakeThisOut@t.the> wrote in message
>news:3bmdnQIN7LDyL3zVnZ2dnUVZ_ofinZ2d@comcast.com...
>>
>> Oh, I get it! it is the Democrats' fault for not voting unanimously to
>> overcome the negative Republican votes! Of course!
><snip>
>
>So, why DIDN'T the dems vote unanimously?
>
They don't want to talk about those 95 representatives. They want to
talk about the Republicans because they can;t stomach the thought that
it was actually a bi partisan split. Stupid assed liberal asswipes
have to get all or nothing and will spin it accordingly.
Poblem is their spin makes them look like even bigger idiots.












'A government big enough to give you everything you want, is
big enough to take away everything you have.'

"You cannot enrich the poor by impoverishing the rich."

On Sep 30, 12:21 am, "Dano" <janeandd....RemoveThis@yahoo.com> wrote:
> "Starkiller" <NoSpam.SKS_SK....RemoveThis@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:iaa3e4tu164t2ud7vreijai54d3v699r2n@4ax.com...
>
>
>
> > On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 04:16:07 GMT, mario in victoria
> > <mario5....RemoveThis@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > >Starkiller wrote:
> > >> On Mon, 29 Sep 2008 23:37:10 -0400, "Dano" <janeandd....RemoveThis@yahoo.com>
> > >> wrote:
>
> > ><snip>
>
> > >>> So.  You want to take a crack at fixing this problem genius?  Or does
> your
> > >>> skill end at sliming others?  We're waiting smartass.  Oh...you've got
> > >>> nothing.  Imagine our surprise!
>
> > >> And your's and Pelosi's fix appears to be to blame the Republicans.
> > >> Imagine that.
>
> > >To be fair, the Democrats voted 140-95 (60% in favour), while the
> > >Republicans voted 65-133 (33% in favour).
>
> > >The numbers would indicate that Republican support similar to Democrat
> > >support would have let the bill pass.
>
> > ><snip>
>
> > >mario in victoria
>
> > Interesting how all of you fools want to point the fingers at the
> > Republicans rather than question your own party members that
> > apparently turned on you.  If all of the democrats had voted the same
> > the bill would have passed regardless.
> > It's also interesting that not one of you idiots care one bit that
> > your house leader took her little opportunity to point fingers and
> > rant to try and make her little political points and talk bullshit to
> > the exact people that she wants to vote her way.  Her own arrogance
> > made her cock sure that the bill was gauranteed to pass so she wanted
> > to be the big shot.  Trying to portray it as though the Republicans
> > had to vote her way out of some self perceived guilt when they are
> > every bit as culpable as, if not more than, the Republicans was a very
> > stupid, childish move.  All because she wanted to appear as though she
> > wielded some kind of real power.
> > Get your own house in order before screaming blame hotshot.
>
> OK.  Now you're just repeating yourself.  The theory is that by repeating a
> lie often enough it becomes accepted as truth.  Wrong.  PLONK.  See ya.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Dano can only take intelligent argument for so long. . .