 |
|
|
|
Next: So, anyone watch The Bronx is Burning?
|
| Author |
Message |
External
Since: May 21, 2006
Posts: 1198
|
(Msg. 31) Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 6:55 pm
Post subject: Re: Omar Infante [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Imported from groups: alt>sports>baseball>detroit-tigers (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 | |
External
Since: Apr 27, 2006
Posts: 2298
|
(Msg. 32) Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 6:55 pm
Post subject: Re: Omar Infante [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Brian Matthews" <noonecares DeleteThis @ddd.com> wrote in message
news:k7ka93d11mf4pbc9jlfdoe44h4q7udles8@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 13:33:55 -0400, "Bill Kawalec"
> <billkawalec DeleteThis @yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Brian Matthews" <noonecares DeleteThis @ddd.com> wrote in message
>>news:293a939k24vpk49jorcu69ofemvfd2uin8@4ax.com...
>>> On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 12:52:41 -0400, "Bill Kawalec"
>>> <billkawalec DeleteThis @yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>well, again, calling Griffey "broken down" isn;t going to help your
>>>>credibility
>>>
>>> Since 2001?
>>>
>>> 2001, 111 games played
>>> 2002, 70 games played
>>> 2003, 53 games played
>>> 2004, 83 games played
>>> 2005, 128 games played
>>> 2006, 108 games played
>>>
>>> Totals? 553 games played out of a possible 972 games.
>>> Average? 92 games played per year.
>>>
>>> I would consider those numbers as an injury prone, older player.
>>> Don't get me wrong, if we could get him for next to nothing and IF he
>>> would play LF, I would do it. But I wouldn't trade a single blue chip
>>> prospect for him. Just a matter of opinion, I suppose. Tigers needs
>>> aren't an older outfielder, even if he is a hall of famer to be. The
>>> left hand bat would be nice, but I would rather have a slugging LH 1st
>>> baseman. And there is the matter of the bullpen. The Tigers are
>>> already the highest scoring team in baseball. Pitching would be a
>>> priority, if it were up to me. But again, it's just my opinion.
>>
>>
>>
>>yeah, I already grasp the concept. Any player on any other team, for you,
>>the glass will always be half empty. Griffey is 37, and doing fine.
>>Perhaps
>>he's past being "injury prone" (I prefer to see it as rotten luck). He
>>AIN'T
>>Higginson.
>>Paul Molitor hit .341, with 113 RBI at age 40...
>
>
> I never brought up Higgy. That was someone else. As for Griffey, he
> won't be coming to Detroit, ever, for any player.
>
> Not.Going.To.Happen.
>
> So....this entire discussion is pointless.
cracks me up when people speak with such authority. I **know** this much;
Griffey won't be coming here unless Jim Leyland wants him here. Beyond that;
no clue.
>
> Brian |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: May 21, 2006
Posts: 1198
|
(Msg. 33) Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 8:55 pm
Post subject: Re: Omar Infante [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Imported from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jul 02, 2003
Posts: 288
|
(Msg. 34) Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 8:55 pm
Post subject: Re: Omar Infante [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
In article <o3qa93ppicp41agk2aql7v2vu02k9c04c0.TakeThisOut@4ax.com>, Brian Matthews says...
>
>On 11 Jul 2007 16:28:45 -0700, snapp44 <snapp44_member.TakeThisOut@newsguy.com>
>wrote:
>
>>In article <-ZidnQqQwo6RlgjbnZ2dnUVZ_vKunZ2d.TakeThisOut@comcast.com>, Bill Kawalec says...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>"Brian Matthews" <noonecares.TakeThisOut@ddd.com> wrote in message
>>>news:c3u99353kg78vjtibspbeptmp0os4ivk3r@4ax.com...
>>>> On 11 Jul 2007 07:26:45 -0700, snapp44 <snapp44_member.TakeThisOut@newsguy.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>In article <28mdnf4VTMLlBwnbnZ2dnUVZ_vyunZ2d.TakeThisOut@comcast.com>, Bill Kawalec
>>>>>says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"Brian Matthews" <noonecares.TakeThisOut@ddd.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>news:4qq89353dmocg6ss03srdlukg984j4avjs@4ax.com...
>>>>>>> Not only that, but when you talk about trades? Who would Cincy want
>>>>>>> for Jr.? I'm sure it's more than the Tigers are willing to give up.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>btw, his trade value is diminsihed by the fact that it's suspected that
>>>>>>the
>>>>>>Reds don't intend to re-sign him, plus the fact that he can veto a trade.
>>>>>>Often, given those circumstances, the team will take a 'something is
>>>>>>better
>>>>>>than nothing' approach. Personally, I'll take the known quantity over
>>>>>>waiting for "the next superstar" any day.
>>>>>
>>>>>Known Quantity = another Injury prone, contract stifling waste of
>>>>>money in the Bobby Higginson tradition. I'll wait for our "next
>>>>>superstar" centerfielder who is already in the system.
>>>>>
>>>>>Dave
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I agree. Sell out the future just because Griffey finally played half
>>>> a season without going on the DL? I don't think so and I'm glad DD is
>>>> smarter than this.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>hey, Einstein! Higginson is NOT a Hall of Fame ballplayer...
>>>
>>
>>So what. You wan't to pay Hall of Fame money to a player who, odds
>>favor is just one game away from another DL stint. Besides, He will
>>sign again with Seattle depriving You and the Tigers of a stupid
>>mistake.
>>
>>Dave
>
>No, I don't believe the Tigers would ever be that stupid. Dombrowski
>is pretty smart and would never mortgage the future, no matter which
>team he's running. It's never been his style.
>
>Brian
Brian, I know which side of the fence you are on in this issue. My
message was directed to BK.
Dave >> Stay informed about: Omar Infante |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Apr 27, 2006
Posts: 2298
|
(Msg. 35) Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 8:56 pm
Post subject: Re: Omar Infante [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"snapp44" <snapp44_member DeleteThis @newsguy.com> wrote in message
news:f73p3d0c54@drn.newsguy.com...
> In article <-ZidnQqQwo6RlgjbnZ2dnUVZ_vKunZ2d DeleteThis @comcast.com>, Bill Kawalec
> says...
>>
>>
>>
>>"Brian Matthews" <noonecares DeleteThis @ddd.com> wrote in message
>>news:c3u99353kg78vjtibspbeptmp0os4ivk3r@4ax.com...
>>> On 11 Jul 2007 07:26:45 -0700, snapp44 <snapp44_member DeleteThis @newsguy.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>In article <28mdnf4VTMLlBwnbnZ2dnUVZ_vyunZ2d DeleteThis @comcast.com>, Bill Kawalec
>>>>says...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>"Brian Matthews" <noonecares DeleteThis @ddd.com> wrote in message
>>>>>news:4qq89353dmocg6ss03srdlukg984j4avjs@4ax.com...
>>>>>> Not only that, but when you talk about trades? Who would Cincy want
>>>>>> for Jr.? I'm sure it's more than the Tigers are willing to give up.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>btw, his trade value is diminsihed by the fact that it's suspected that
>>>>>the
>>>>>Reds don't intend to re-sign him, plus the fact that he can veto a
>>>>>trade.
>>>>>Often, given those circumstances, the team will take a 'something is
>>>>>better
>>>>>than nothing' approach. Personally, I'll take the known quantity over
>>>>>waiting for "the next superstar" any day.
>>>>
>>>>Known Quantity = another Injury prone, contract stifling waste of
>>>>money in the Bobby Higginson tradition. I'll wait for our "next
>>>>superstar" centerfielder who is already in the system.
>>>>
>>>>Dave
>>>
>>>
>>> I agree. Sell out the future just because Griffey finally played half
>>> a season without going on the DL? I don't think so and I'm glad DD is
>>> smarter than this.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>hey, Einstein! Higginson is NOT a Hall of Fame ballplayer...
>>
>
> So what. You wan't to pay Hall of Fame money to a player who, odds
> favor is just one game away from another DL stint. Besides, He will
> sign again with Seattle depriving You and the Tigers of a stupid
> mistake.
well, it has not escpaed my notice that the vast majority of his DL time is
in the NL. He may wind up back in Seattle. Nonetheless, if it were up to me
(obviously it isn't) I'd be willing to offer him an incentive-laden
contract. Like I said, he's a better ballplayer, in every respect, than
Craig Monroe...
>
> Dave
> >> Stay informed about: Omar Infante |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Apr 27, 2006
Posts: 2298
|
(Msg. 36) Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 8:58 pm
Post subject: Re: Omar Infante [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
I just have to laugh at the thought that someone can call acquiring Ken
Griffey, Jr. "stupid." Not that I'm saying it **will** happen, but . . .
--
I never read email at the Yahoo address!
"snapp44" <snapp44_member.DeleteThis@newsguy.com> wrote in message
news:f73q7r0eb1@drn.newsguy.com...
> In article <o3qa93ppicp41agk2aql7v2vu02k9c04c0.DeleteThis@4ax.com>, Brian Matthews
> says...
>>
>>On 11 Jul 2007 16:28:45 -0700, snapp44 <snapp44_member.DeleteThis@newsguy.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>In article <-ZidnQqQwo6RlgjbnZ2dnUVZ_vKunZ2d.DeleteThis@comcast.com>, Bill Kawalec
>>>says...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Brian Matthews" <noonecares.DeleteThis@ddd.com> wrote in message
>>>>news:c3u99353kg78vjtibspbeptmp0os4ivk3r@4ax.com...
>>>>> On 11 Jul 2007 07:26:45 -0700, snapp44 <snapp44_member.DeleteThis@newsguy.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>In article <28mdnf4VTMLlBwnbnZ2dnUVZ_vyunZ2d.DeleteThis@comcast.com>, Bill
>>>>>>Kawalec
>>>>>>says...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"Brian Matthews" <noonecares.DeleteThis@ddd.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>news:4qq89353dmocg6ss03srdlukg984j4avjs@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>> Not only that, but when you talk about trades? Who would Cincy want
>>>>>>>> for Jr.? I'm sure it's more than the Tigers are willing to give up.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>btw, his trade value is diminsihed by the fact that it's suspected
>>>>>>>that
>>>>>>>the
>>>>>>>Reds don't intend to re-sign him, plus the fact that he can veto a
>>>>>>>trade.
>>>>>>>Often, given those circumstances, the team will take a 'something is
>>>>>>>better
>>>>>>>than nothing' approach. Personally, I'll take the known quantity over
>>>>>>>waiting for "the next superstar" any day.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Known Quantity = another Injury prone, contract stifling waste of
>>>>>>money in the Bobby Higginson tradition. I'll wait for our "next
>>>>>>superstar" centerfielder who is already in the system.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Dave
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I agree. Sell out the future just because Griffey finally played half
>>>>> a season without going on the DL? I don't think so and I'm glad DD is
>>>>> smarter than this.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>hey, Einstein! Higginson is NOT a Hall of Fame ballplayer...
>>>>
>>>
>>>So what. You wan't to pay Hall of Fame money to a player who, odds
>>>favor is just one game away from another DL stint. Besides, He will
>>>sign again with Seattle depriving You and the Tigers of a stupid
>>>mistake.
>>>
>>>Dave
>>
>>No, I don't believe the Tigers would ever be that stupid. Dombrowski
>>is pretty smart and would never mortgage the future, no matter which
>>team he's running. It's never been his style.
>>
>>Brian
> Brian, I know which side of the fence you are on in this issue. My
> message was directed to BK.
>
> Dave
> >> Stay informed about: Omar Infante |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jul 02, 2003
Posts: 288
|
(Msg. 37) Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 8:58 pm
Post subject: Re: Omar Infante [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
In article <-JqdnbeWp6Mp4QjbnZ2dnUVZ_qOpnZ2d RemoveThis @comcast.com>, Bill Kawalec says...
>
>I just have to laugh at the thought that someone can call acquiring Ken
>Griffey, Jr. "stupid." Not that I'm saying it **will** happen, but . . .
Acquiring him for what it WOULD cost would be stupid. And when he gets
hurt it would be a waste. Better to save some of that money to use in
addition to insure you sign Porcello, which isn't expected to be easy.
If we happen to win the WS this year I don't wan't 2008 to turn into a
fire sale like what happened to the Marlins a few years ago. We have
alot of veterans on this team and it's bound to bite us in the azz down
the road.
Dave
>
>
>--
>I never read email at the Yahoo address!
>"snapp44" <snapp44_member RemoveThis @newsguy.com> wrote in message
>news:f73q7r0eb1@drn.newsguy.com...
>> In article <o3qa93ppicp41agk2aql7v2vu02k9c04c0 RemoveThis @4ax.com>, Brian Matthews
>> says...
>>>
>>>On 11 Jul 2007 16:28:45 -0700, snapp44 <snapp44_member RemoveThis @newsguy.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>In article <-ZidnQqQwo6RlgjbnZ2dnUVZ_vKunZ2d RemoveThis @comcast.com>, Bill Kawalec
>>>>says...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>"Brian Matthews" <noonecares RemoveThis @ddd.com> wrote in message
>>>>>news:c3u99353kg78vjtibspbeptmp0os4ivk3r@4ax.com...
>>>>>> On 11 Jul 2007 07:26:45 -0700, snapp44 <snapp44_member RemoveThis @newsguy.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>In article <28mdnf4VTMLlBwnbnZ2dnUVZ_vyunZ2d RemoveThis @comcast.com>, Bill
>>>>>>>Kawalec
>>>>>>>says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>"Brian Matthews" <noonecares RemoveThis @ddd.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>news:4qq89353dmocg6ss03srdlukg984j4avjs@4ax.com...
(snipped) >> Stay informed about: Omar Infante |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: May 17, 2006
Posts: 7
|
(Msg. 38) Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 9:38 pm
Post subject: Re: Omar Infante [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
snapp44 <snapp44_member RemoveThis @newsguy.com> wrote in
news:f73p3d0c54@drn.newsguy.com:
> In article <-ZidnQqQwo6RlgjbnZ2dnUVZ_vKunZ2d RemoveThis @comcast.com>, Bill
> Kawalec says...
>>
>>
>>
>>"Brian Matthews" <noonecares RemoveThis @ddd.com> wrote in message
>>news:c3u99353kg78vjtibspbeptmp0os4ivk3r@4ax.com...
>>> On 11 Jul 2007 07:26:45 -0700, snapp44 <snapp44_member RemoveThis @newsguy.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>In article <28mdnf4VTMLlBwnbnZ2dnUVZ_vyunZ2d RemoveThis @comcast.com>, Bill
>>>>Kawalec says...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>"Brian Matthews" <noonecares RemoveThis @ddd.com> wrote in message
>>>>>news:4qq89353dmocg6ss03srdlukg984j4avjs@4ax.com...
>>>>>> Not only that, but when you talk about trades? Who would Cincy
>>>>>> want for Jr.? I'm sure it's more than the Tigers are willing to
>>>>>> give up.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>btw, his trade value is diminsihed by the fact that it's suspected
>>>>>that the
>>>>>Reds don't intend to re-sign him, plus the fact that he can veto a
>>>>>trade. Often, given those circumstances, the team will take a
>>>>>'something is better
>>>>>than nothing' approach. Personally, I'll take the known quantity
>>>>>over waiting for "the next superstar" any day.
>>>>
>>>>Known Quantity = another Injury prone, contract stifling waste of
>>>>money in the Bobby Higginson tradition. I'll wait for our "next
>>>>superstar" centerfielder who is already in the system.
>>>>
>>>>Dave
>>>
>>>
>>> I agree. Sell out the future just because Griffey finally played
>>> half a season without going on the DL? I don't think so and I'm glad
>>> DD is smarter than this.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>hey, Einstein! Higginson is NOT a Hall of Fame ballplayer...
>>
>
> So what. You wan't to pay Hall of Fame money to a player who, odds
> favor is just one game away from another DL stint. Besides, He will
> sign again with Seattle depriving You and the Tigers of a stupid
> mistake.
>
> Dave
My moneys with your assessment Dave, Seattle for sure! Wouldn't be
surprised to see A-Rod back there sometime either.
Louie
> >> Stay informed about: Omar Infante |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Apr 27, 2006
Posts: 2298
|
(Msg. 39) Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2007 1:01 am
Post subject: Re: Omar Infante [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"snapp44" <snapp44_member RemoveThis @newsguy.com> wrote in message
news:f7434v0118l@drn.newsguy.com...
> In article <-JqdnbeWp6Mp4QjbnZ2dnUVZ_qOpnZ2d RemoveThis @comcast.com>, Bill Kawalec
> says...
>>
>>I just have to laugh at the thought that someone can call acquiring Ken
>>Griffey, Jr. "stupid." Not that I'm saying it **will** happen, but . . .
>
> Acquiring him for what it WOULD cost would be stupid. And when he gets
> hurt it would be a waste. Better to save some of that money to use in
> addition to insure you sign Porcello, which isn't expected to be easy.
> If we happen to win the WS this year I don't wan't 2008 to turn into a
> fire sale like what happened to the Marlins a few years ago. We have
> alot of veterans on this team and it's bound to bite us in the azz down
> the road.
well, obviously I have a lot more respect for Ken Griffey, Jr., the Hall of
Fame ballplayer, than you do. I think your "fire sale" comment borders on
delusional, because this franchise is owned by Mr. Ilitch, and we already
know how he operates. Be that as it may, we're already beating a dead horse
here.
>
> Dave
>>
>>
>>--
>>I never read email at the Yahoo address!
>>"snapp44" <snapp44_member RemoveThis @newsguy.com> wrote in message
>>news:f73q7r0eb1@drn.newsguy.com...
>>> In article <o3qa93ppicp41agk2aql7v2vu02k9c04c0 RemoveThis @4ax.com>, Brian Matthews
>>> says...
>>>>
>>>>On 11 Jul 2007 16:28:45 -0700, snapp44 <snapp44_member RemoveThis @newsguy.com>
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>In article <-ZidnQqQwo6RlgjbnZ2dnUVZ_vKunZ2d RemoveThis @comcast.com>, Bill Kawalec
>>>>>says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"Brian Matthews" <noonecares RemoveThis @ddd.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>news:c3u99353kg78vjtibspbeptmp0os4ivk3r@4ax.com...
>>>>>>> On 11 Jul 2007 07:26:45 -0700, snapp44 <snapp44_member RemoveThis @newsguy.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>In article <28mdnf4VTMLlBwnbnZ2dnUVZ_vyunZ2d RemoveThis @comcast.com>, Bill
>>>>>>>>Kawalec
>>>>>>>>says...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>"Brian Matthews" <noonecares RemoveThis @ddd.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>news:4qq89353dmocg6ss03srdlukg984j4avjs@4ax.com...
> (snipped)
> >> Stay informed about: Omar Infante |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Apr 27, 2006
Posts: 2298
|
(Msg. 40) Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2007 1:03 am
Post subject: Re: Omar Infante [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Louie" <me.DeleteThis@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:8NWdnclzSPCOCQjbnZ2dnUVZ_qLinZ2d@giganews.com...
> snapp44 <snapp44_member.DeleteThis@newsguy.com> wrote in
> news:f73p3d0c54@drn.newsguy.com:
>
>> In article <-ZidnQqQwo6RlgjbnZ2dnUVZ_vKunZ2d.DeleteThis@comcast.com>, Bill
>> Kawalec says...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>"Brian Matthews" <noonecares.DeleteThis@ddd.com> wrote in message
>>>news:c3u99353kg78vjtibspbeptmp0os4ivk3r@4ax.com...
>>>> On 11 Jul 2007 07:26:45 -0700, snapp44 <snapp44_member.DeleteThis@newsguy.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>In article <28mdnf4VTMLlBwnbnZ2dnUVZ_vyunZ2d.DeleteThis@comcast.com>, Bill
>>>>>Kawalec says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"Brian Matthews" <noonecares.DeleteThis@ddd.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>news:4qq89353dmocg6ss03srdlukg984j4avjs@4ax.com...
>>>>>>> Not only that, but when you talk about trades? Who would Cincy
>>>>>>> want for Jr.? I'm sure it's more than the Tigers are willing to
>>>>>>> give up.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>btw, his trade value is diminsihed by the fact that it's suspected
>>>>>>that the
>>>>>>Reds don't intend to re-sign him, plus the fact that he can veto a
>>>>>>trade. Often, given those circumstances, the team will take a
>>>>>>'something is better
>>>>>>than nothing' approach. Personally, I'll take the known quantity
>>>>>>over waiting for "the next superstar" any day.
>>>>>
>>>>>Known Quantity = another Injury prone, contract stifling waste of
>>>>>money in the Bobby Higginson tradition. I'll wait for our "next
>>>>>superstar" centerfielder who is already in the system.
>>>>>
>>>>>Dave
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I agree. Sell out the future just because Griffey finally played
>>>> half a season without going on the DL? I don't think so and I'm glad
>>>> DD is smarter than this.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>hey, Einstein! Higginson is NOT a Hall of Fame ballplayer...
>>>
>>
>> So what. You wan't to pay Hall of Fame money to a player who, odds
>> favor is just one game away from another DL stint. Besides, He will
>> sign again with Seattle depriving You and the Tigers of a stupid
>> mistake.
>>
>> Dave
>
>
> My moneys with your assessment Dave, Seattle for sure! Wouldn't be
> surprised to see A-Rod back there sometime either.
I wonder if Junior regrets ever having left Seattle. In any case, I'd almost
bet he will be back in the AL, and that people are going to be surprised at
how much he has left.
>
>
>
> Louie
>>
> >> Stay informed about: Omar Infante |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jun 01, 2007
Posts: 46
|
(Msg. 41) Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2007 5:17 am
Post subject: Re: Omar Infante [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Jul 10, 5:04 pm, srudni... RemoveThis @webtv.net (Stephen R.) wrote:
> Very valuable member of the team supersub agreed or disagreed !!
Omar Infante gets his own thread in this NG?
I'll call that come-uppance.
SC >> Stay informed about: Omar Infante |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Sep 20, 2006
Posts: 624
|
(Msg. 42) Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2007 12:12 pm
Post subject: Re: Omar Infante [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
In article <7cka9359b9pbrk44a8ttej9n5pid3h9487 DeleteThis @4ax.com>,
Brian Matthews <noonecares DeleteThis @ddd.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 14:08:14 -0400, Monkey <never DeleteThis @spam.net> wrote:
>
> >In article <G9-dnao3gYKXiQjbnZ2dnUVZ_silnZ2d DeleteThis @giganews.com>,
> > "Likely Story" <JohnPoutre DeleteThis @IsAFrenchFaggot.com> wrote:
> >
> >> "Brian Matthews" <noonecares DeleteThis @ddd.com> wrote in message
> >> news:293a939k24vpk49jorcu69ofemvfd2uin8@4ax.com...
> >> > On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 12:52:41 -0400, "Bill Kawalec"
> >> > <billkawalec DeleteThis @yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>well, again, calling Griffey "broken down" isn;t going to help your
> >> >>credibility
> >> >
> >> > Since 2001?
> >> >
> >> > 2001, 111 games played
> >> > 2002, 70 games played
> >> > 2003, 53 games played
> >> > 2004, 83 games played
> >> > 2005, 128 games played
> >> > 2006, 108 games played
> >> >
> >> > Totals? 553 games played out of a possible 972 games.
> >> > Average? 92 games played per year.
> >> >
> >> > I would consider those numbers as an injury prone, older player.
> >> > Don't get me wrong, if we could get him for next to nothing and IF he
> >> > would play LF, I would do it. But I wouldn't trade a single blue chip
> >> > prospect for him. Just a matter of opinion, I suppose. Tigers needs
> >> > aren't an older outfielder, even if he is a hall of famer to be. The
> >> > left hand bat would be nice, but I would rather have a slugging LH 1st
> >> > baseman. And there is the matter of the bullpen. The Tigers are
> >> > already the highest scoring team in baseball. Pitching would be a
> >> > priority, if it were up to me. But again, it's just my opinion.
> >> >
> >> > Brian
> >>
> >> Hold on. I have to go make popcorn.
> >> Another great BK & BM matchup!
> >
> >
> >this might be the only time I laugh out loud today
> >
> >thank you
>
>
> Glad to be the source of your enjoyment. I aim to please. : )
>
> Brian
laughter is the best medicine
Red Green: If women can't find you handsome, make sure they find you
handy.
--
 |)
Chew 'em up Tigers >> Stay informed about: Omar Infante |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ
Profile
Private Messages
Log in
