In article <FJadnbP7AIWPODLYnZ2dnUVZ_tqnnZ2d.DeleteThis@cavtel.net>,
FSogol.DeleteThis@nospamplease.org says...
> Dan Szymborski wrote:
>
> > A player must be truly awful if Womack's a suitable Plan B.
> > Having Tony Womack on your team is like using lottery tickets as
> > your car insurance.
> >
> What's wrong with having a journeyman player to play some backup IF
> positions?
When the journeyman player can't hit or field. Womack's a
horrific defensive infielder and would have to improve
substantially to be an awful hitter.
> Womack can also play the outfield. Good guy to have around
> with a young inexperienced team with a young manager. Womack avg .273
> for 13 seasons seems ok.
Not when the .273 is by far the *best* part of your offensive
profile. 273/317/356 is terrible for a second baseman and worse
for a second baseman who has no glove.
Him being in the outfield doesn't help things - if you're
playing a hitter as wretched as Womack is in the outfield, you
might as well just quit.
There is no role that Womack can contribute in.
> How would our season look if Lopez got hurt?
> Lopez is currently our best healthy hitter/run scorer.
Doesn't the Baltimore/DC area have any homeless left? Most of
them are probably better players than Womack.
--
Dan Szymborski
dan.DeleteThis@baseballprimerREMOVE.com
"A critic who refuses to attack what is bad is not
a whole-hearted supporter of what is good."
-Robert Schumann
>> Stay informed about: Nats set to sign Tony Womack