On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 06:45:21 -0800 (PST), brianj
<firstpres.TakeThisOut@turtlecreek.net> wrote:
>On Nov 29, 8:18 am, "Likely - Story" <Define....TakeThisOut@Right.com> wrote:
>>
>> "Blockbuster" LOL!
>> Not one damn star and you call it a blockbuster trade.
>> With every post you make lately, you lose more and more credibility.
>> I am still laughing about when you suggested the Yankees might trade A-Roid
>> to the Twins.
>> LOL! That, more than anything else, proved you have no baseball knowledge.
I would stack my baseball knowledge up against yours, any day.
I'm certainly no MLB expert, and there are others in this Twins group
who I would NOT test my knowledge against, but *you* I am not
worried about.
>Did anybody ever mention that your user name is quite apt? In case
>you are looking for variety, other good ones would be Tedious, Sadly-
>Predictable, and Juvenile.
All good choices for "LS" to consider.
>S. didn't choose the word *blockbuster*,
>moron. This is a fact you would know if you had clicked on the link
>he provided and noticed that the headline was not of his writing
>(unless he is Kelly Thesier's alter ego, which seems very unlikely).
And the A-Rod pipe dream was just that. Unrealistic as it may be,
sometimes it's fun to play the "what if?" game.
Based on the emails to Kelly Thesier (no, definitely not my alter ego)
at MLB.COM speculating about the Twins possibly making a play
for A-Rod, I wasn't the only one with the dream. But realistically,
who the hell (besides the Yankees) would want to be saddled with
that ridiculous A-Rod contract?
- Scott Smith: scott.smith.TakeThisOut@iphouse.com
MySpace:
http://www.myspace.com/choppersmith >> Stay informed about: TWINS NEWS: Twins complete blockbuster trade with Rays 
FAQ
Profile
Private Messages
Log in
