YKW 04 <usenetykw03-at-hotmail.com> wrote:
>If so, one has to wonder whether Moorad's job is to nurture a winning
>organization, or to cut payroll without regard to on-field success. Yes, you
At this point, cutting payroll won't have much effect on
won-loss rates.
>training next year not with a HOFer leading a rebuilt and potentially
>formidable rotation, but with one filled with OK guys who don't really scare
>anyone.
It's a step.
>lots of tickets for) a club that is clearly built to do some damage in the
>postseason, with a strong lineup one-through-seven, solid defense, one or
>two key offensive reserves, three very-good-to-dominating starters, three
>dependable bullpen arms, and a manager who inspires confidence in both the
>team and in the fan base.
The Astros.
>With what's coming through the farm, we have the offense (and =could= have
>the defense, if Cintron is ousted, Scottie Hairston ever relaxes, and Dr.
>Strangeglove over at first can be replaced)
I've been working out. Maybe Moorad will give me a look.
>we have the potential for the
>bullpen (if health can ever be restored to this bunch), and we're one
>workhorse mid-3.00 ERA guy from having the starters. Yes, we need a
>manager -- we probably also need a veteran to close games for a year or so,
>until either Aquino or Valverde has enough experience to trust his stuff in
Aquino's looking good. Valverde's a ghost.
>pressure situations -- but removing the linchpin around which the rotation
>is built would be a backward step so vast that not even Billy Martin -- with
>an in-prime Sparky Lyle =AND= Goose Gossage in tow -- could come in and
>press forward as a legitimate contender.
Send in your resume'.
--Blair
"If he lowers beer prices a buck,
he'll win back the fans that follow
Randy out the door."
>> Stay informed about: Has Moorad done anything significant yet?