On 6/8/06 8:30 PM, in article
1149816637.341382.3390.DeleteThis@y43g2000cwc.googlegroups.com,
"yumyum123@sbcglobal.net" <yumyum123.DeleteThis@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
> Eric Margheim wrote:
>> Obviously it's a very small sample size, but I really like what Marmol has
>> shown so far.
>>
>> He appears to have excellent control. Even his balls don't miss by much
>> (insert pun here).
>>
>> 6 Ks, 3 hits and no walks in 4 IP. 97MPH fastball and a very nice
>> slider/curve.
>
>
> Looking at this minor league numbers he walks a lot of hitters. Thats
> going to
> catch up to him very quickly.
>
>
> Lance
>
If my math is right, and going by Ray's numbers, Marmol allowed 3.87 walks
per 9 innings (BB/9) at Iowa. That's by no means a great number, but just
for rough comparison's sake, here's how the Cub starters stack up this year.
Staff, 4.44
Maddux, 2.26
Wood, 3.66
Marshall, 4.03
Rusch, 4.07
Zambrano, 5.23
Of course, the Cubs are dead last in the NL in that category. But hell,
Marmol is still an improvement. And going by walks alone, which guy above
would you assume is the Cubs' ace?
>> Stay informed about: Marmol. I like what I see