Welcome to BaseballBoardz.com!
FAQFAQ   SearchSearch      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log in/Register/PasswordLog in/Register/Password

No DH in NL Parks

 
   Baseball Forums (Home) -> Baseball General RSS
Next:  Baseball General: Frequently Asked Questions about the Baseball Labor Negoti..  
Author Message
Will in New Haven

External


Since: May 10, 2007
Posts: 29



(Msg. 1) Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 2:55 pm
Post subject: No DH in NL Parks
Archived from groups: rec>sport>baseball (more info?)

Could the announcers quit whining about the Pitchers having to bat in
NL parks. There are two solutions easily available to the AL or its
teams.

Ok. Let's say we don't want to give up the DH. I suppose most AL fans
don't. So that solution is out. Let's look at a second solution:

Give up the DH in the minor leagues so that our Pitchers are better
able to deal with the game in NL parks. The reasons for the DH are
much less important in the minor leagues. In fact, they don't really
exist at all. In conjunction with that, stop treating batting practice
as some sort of extremely limited resource. Have the Pitchers take
batting practice on a regular, if not all that frequent, basis and
bunting and baserunning practice on an even more frequent schedule.

These are professional athletes and wrapping them in cotton is not the
answer. I saw Wang hurt today and I expect to hear about it all week
from the Yankee announces. I'm a Yankee fan but people get hurt in
sports and having them practice for the situations they will encounter
makes more sense than whining about it.

 >> Stay informed about: No DH in NL Parks 
Back to top
Login to vote
Will in New Haven

External


Since: May 10, 2007
Posts: 29



(Msg. 2) Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 5:39 pm
Post subject: Re: No DH in NL Parks [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Jun 15, 8:34 pm, Mark Vaughan <m.a.vaug... DeleteThis @invalid.address.net>
wrote:
> Will in New Haven <bill.re... DeleteThis @taylorandfrancis.com> wrote innews:956203a9-4670-4bfb-b735-fd44b4ca8223@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com:
>
> > stop treating batting practice as some sort of extremely limited
> > resource. Have the Pitchers take batting practice on a regular,
> > if not all that frequent, basis
>
> why limit the frequency? weren't most pitchers pretty good batters
> too, back in their high school days? so when is it that they get
> segregated from the rest of the pack, and told that hitting isn't a
> necessary part of their skill sets?

It often happens in _high school_ itself these days. Which makes it
all a sefl-fulfilling prophecy. It also hurts the chances of someone
switching from Pitcher to position player, although it still happens.

>
> > people get hurt in sports and having them practice for the
> > situations they will encounter makes more sense than whining
> > about it.
>
> sure...but whining about it is so much easier to do!!!

To be fair about it, much as I hate to do so, the people doing the
complaining are the announcers. They are not empowered to carry out
the changes that would have to be made. And they don't want to be
saying that the AL isn't perfect.

--
Will in New Haven

 >> Stay informed about: No DH in NL Parks 
Back to top
Login to vote
Mark Vaughan

External


Since: Jul 13, 2005
Posts: 98



(Msg. 3) Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 12:34 am
Post subject: Re: No DH in NL Parks [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Will in New Haven <bill.reich.DeleteThis@taylorandfrancis.com> wrote in
news:956203a9-4670-4bfb-b735-fd44b4ca8223@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com:


> stop treating batting practice as some sort of extremely limited
> resource. Have the Pitchers take batting practice on a regular,
> if not all that frequent, basis

why limit the frequency? weren't most pitchers pretty good batters
too, back in their high school days? so when is it that they get
segregated from the rest of the pack, and told that hitting isn't a
necessary part of their skill sets?


> people get hurt in sports and having them practice for the
> situations they will encounter makes more sense than whining
> about it.

sure...but whining about it is so much easier to do!!!



--

Mark Vaughan
 >> Stay informed about: No DH in NL Parks 
Back to top
Login to vote
DavidFoss

External


Since: Nov 15, 2007
Posts: 2



(Msg. 4) Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 9:18 am
Post subject: Re: No DH in NL Parks [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

So far this year, AL Pitchers are batting .185/.219/.207 while NL
Pitchers are batting .145/.184/.183. Small sample size for the AL,
but its not playing like a big disadvantage so far. NL pitchers can't
hit either.
 >> Stay informed about: No DH in NL Parks 
Back to top
Login to vote
Will in New Haven

External


Since: May 10, 2007
Posts: 29



(Msg. 5) Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 9:36 am
Post subject: Re: No DH in NL Parks [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Jun 16, 12:18 pm, DavidFoss <davidrf... DeleteThis @gmail.com> wrote:
> So far this year, AL Pitchers are batting .185/.219/.207 while NL
> Pitchers are batting .145/.184/.183.  Small sample size for the AL,
> but its not playing like a big disadvantage so far.  NL pitchers can't
> hit either.

The big issue with the announcers is safety. And Wang's injury is just
going to make them whine more and more. Also, Sac bunts seem tougher
for guys who haven't practiced them. Since the NL isn't going to give
up having the Pitchrs hit, the AL teams could help their guys stay
safe and learn to sac bunt. Although, if safety were a big issue they
would eliminate the Catcher's position entirely.


And that IS a very small sample size.

--
Will in New Haven
 >> Stay informed about: No DH in NL Parks 
Back to top
Login to vote
Tarkus

External


Since: Jun 18, 2006
Posts: 683



(Msg. 6) Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 11:51 am
Post subject: Re: No DH in NL Parks [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

DavidFoss wrote:
> So far this year, AL Pitchers are batting .185/.219/.207 while NL
> Pitchers are batting .145/.184/.183. Small sample size for the AL,
> but its not playing like a big disadvantage so far. NL pitchers can't
> hit either.

Nor do NL teams invest a great deal of money into what is in effect
pinch-hitters, so if anyone's disadvantaged in the current setup, it's
arguably NL teams (though you can also argue they have more money to
spend on the traditional nine positions).

--
Pitchers.bat found. Delete dh.sys (Y,y)?
 >> Stay informed about: No DH in NL Parks 
Back to top
Login to vote
Timothy J. Lee

External


Since: Jul 08, 2003
Posts: 13



(Msg. 7) Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 11:26 pm
Post subject: Re: No DH in NL Parks [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

In article <956203a9-4670-4bfb-b735-fd44b4ca8223 DeleteThis @m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com>,
Will in New Haven <bill.reich DeleteThis @taylorandfrancis.com> wrote:
>In conjunction with that, stop treating batting practice
>as some sort of extremely limited resource. Have the Pitchers take
>batting practice on a regular, if not all that frequent, basis and
>bunting and baserunning practice on an even more frequent schedule.

Realistically, that doesn't happen much in the NL, where most pitchers
have low OBA on par with AL pitchers. The reason? A starting pitcher
who practices batting may raise his OBA from .150 to .350 for 2 or 3
plate appearances (an average of safely reaching base 0.4 to 0.6 times
per game) -- but he may find it worthwhile to practice pitching instead
to reduce the opposing batters' OBA from .350 to .340 for 18 or more
plate appearances, reducing opponents safely reaching base 1.8 or more
times per game). I.e. a small improvement in pitching outweights a
large improvement in batting for a starting pitcher, so it likely makes
more sense for a starting pitcher (or long reliever) to do more pitching
practice than batting practice. Short relievers may not be in the game
long enough to bat anyway, so they have even less incentive to do much
batting practice.

--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Timothy J. Lee
Unsolicited bulk or commercial email is not welcome.
No warranty of any kind is provided with this message.
 >> Stay informed about: No DH in NL Parks 
Back to top
Login to vote
bobkoca42

External


Since: Jul 02, 2008
Posts: 1



(Msg. 8) Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 1:10 am
Post subject: Re: No DH in NL Parks [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Jul 1, 7:26 pm, remov....RemoveThis@sonic.net (Timothy J. Lee) wrote:
> In article <956203a9-4670-4bfb-b735-fd44b4ca8....RemoveThis@m36g2000hse.googlegroups..com>,
> Will in New Haven  <bill.re....RemoveThis@taylorandfrancis.com> wrote:
>
> >In conjunction with that, stop treating batting practice
> >as some sort of extremely limited resource. Have the Pitchers take
> >batting practice on a regular, if not all that frequent, basis and
> >bunting and baserunning practice on an even more frequent schedule.
>
> Realistically, that doesn't happen much in the NL, where most pitchers
> have low OBA on par with AL pitchers.  The reason?  A starting pitcher
> who practices batting may raise his OBA from .150 to .350 for 2 or 3
> plate appearances (an average of safely reaching base 0.4 to 0.6 times
> per game) -- but he may find it worthwhile to practice pitching instead
> to reduce the opposing batters' OBA from .350 to .340 for 18 or more
> plate appearances, reducing opponents safely reaching base 1.8 or more
> times per game).  I.e. a small improvement in pitching outweights a
> large improvement in batting for a starting pitcher, so it likely makes
> more sense for a starting pitcher (or long reliever) to do more pitching
> practice than batting practice.  Short relievers may not be in the game
> long enough to bat anyway, so they have even less incentive to do much
> batting practice.
>
> --
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Timothy J. Lee


You have a point about allocation of practice time. I think your
suggested increase though if they did practice hitting is much too
large. On what basis do you think they could raise their OBA that
much? I doubt there is enough batting talent. I often hear that major
league pitchers were often the best hitters on their high school
teams, but big deal. What % of top hitters on high school teams make
it to the big leagues?

Bob Koca
 >> Stay informed about: No DH in NL Parks 
Back to top
Login to vote
Tarkus

External


Since: Jun 18, 2006
Posts: 683



(Msg. 9) Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 2:10 am
Post subject: Re: No DH in NL Parks [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

bobkoca42 RemoveThis @gmail.com wrote:
> You have a point about allocation of practice time. I think your
> suggested increase though if they did practice hitting is much too
> large. On what basis do you think they could raise their OBA that
> much? I doubt there is enough batting talent. I often hear that major
> league pitchers were often the best hitters on their high school
> teams, but big deal. What % of top hitters on high school teams make
> it to the big leagues?

It's not just that. Batting practice is in no way, shape or form the
same as facing live pitching in a MLB game. 3 or 4 ABs (if you're
lucky) every five days is not conducive to being a good hitter, no
matter how much hitting talent you have.

--
Pitchers.bat found. Delete dh.sys (Y,y)?
 >> Stay informed about: No DH in NL Parks 
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
   Baseball Forums (Home) -> Baseball General All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada) (change)
Page 1 of 1

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]