<bushlyed.DeleteThis@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1182986820.054803.275300@d30g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
> Isn't that anti-capitalistic? You rail against socialism and yet you
> are willing to enforce it here
This is where I have to describe the difference between a company and the
public.
Major League Baseball is a company. As a fan, I would like to see a level
playing field. Either MLB wants to sell a level playing field or a lopsided
sports leauge. Right now they chose the lopsided sports league with small
baby steps of profit sharing and such.
That in no way can be compared to socialism because one is private and one
is public.
Thats like the bozos who try to compare the law of consecration to
socialism.
With that said, I never said that MLB should be forced to be a level playing
field. Just what I would like to see.
As for politics or social well being, I would like to see the world help
each other out without the force of government. However, I think that choice
should be theirs to make.
> Given that much of the revenue for MLB is shared, the teams that are
> not paying a lot for talent are doing so to pocket a lot of profit
>
> Had the salary cap not been introduced in the NFL, the Cowboys
> probably would have won two or three more Super Bowls as they would
> have been able to keep a lot of the awesome talent they amassed
> >> Stay informed about: Is DFW loserville USA?