Welcome to BaseballBoardz.com!
FAQFAQ   SearchSearch      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log inLog in

No DC Move - No Anti-Trust Benefits

 
   Baseball Forums (Home) -> Montreal Expos RSS
Next:  why do the expos draw so poor  
Author Message
StandingUpInAHammock

External


Since: Aug 09, 2004
Posts: 1



(Msg. 1) Posted: Mon Aug 09, 2004 2:44 pm
Post subject: No DC Move - No Anti-Trust Benefits
Archived from groups: alt>sports>baseball>montreal-expos (more info?)

Dear Mr. Selig,

The problem is very simple.

You've put yourself in the back pocket of Orioles owner Peter Angelos.
There's no denying it. So the rational thinker would say it's now time
to disqualify yourself as Commissioner of Baseball from having
anything to do with the decision to move the Montreal Expos to a new
city. Just as a Judge with conflict of interest would do, you need to
step aside.

Step aside now. Before the Owner's Meeting in Philadelphia in
mid-August. How a team owner became Commish is suspect to begin with.
How a low down used car salesman who flipped his own team to the
National League as Commish, and manipulated proposed revenue figures
to get the Brewers in the first place is beyond me too, but for
discussion another time.

Why not have baseball's greatest ambassador, Tommy Lasorda, take on
the CoB position? Why not a successful businessman like Peter
Uberroth? How about a reformer who's not afraid to take action when
needed, like Arnold Swartzenegger? (OK, just kidding, but you get the
idea!)

Here's the incentive to step aside. If the relocation cmte. doesn't
decide to move the Expos to Washington, DC, then I'm fully prepared to
launch an all out campaign to have the US Senate open hearings to
remove Baseball's Anti-trust protection. Since you are obviously in
collusion on so many issues, from ticket prices, revenue sharing and
player salaries, maybe it's time we hold a magnifying glass to the
inner workings of MLB!

Do the best thing for Baseball.

1) Remove yourself from contract renewal as CoB before the
Philadelphia owner's mtgs.
2) Move the Expos to DC...today...not after the mtgs....not after the
season...NOW!
3) Sell the Brewers on your way out the door.



Nuff.

 >> Stay informed about: No DC Move - No Anti-Trust Benefits 
Back to top
Login to vote
John C. Baker

External


Since: Aug 28, 2003
Posts: 185



(Msg. 2) Posted: Mon Aug 09, 2004 3:11 pm
Post subject: Re: No DC Move - No Anti-Trust Benefits [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

In article <e270393c.0408091344.381bdaf3 DeleteThis @posting.google.com>,
standingupinahammock DeleteThis @yahoo.com (StandingUpInAHammock) wrote:

> Why not a successful businessman like Peter Uberroth?

Uberroth as basebal commissioner. Yeah, right. Oh wait ...

> Here's the incentive to step aside. If the relocation cmte. doesn't
> decide to move the Expos to Washington, DC, then I'm fully prepared to
> launch an all out campaign to have the US Senate open hearings to
> remove Baseball's Anti-trust protection.

Sorry "Standing." You'll get little sympathy from me. As ironic as it
is, and no matter how folks here hate the "business" of baseball, the
anti-trust exemption is one of the few things that has kept the Expos in
our beloved Montréal.

If the relocation committee DOES decide to move the Expos to Washington
(and assuming the RICO lawsuit is not successful in preventing it), then
that will prove Selig a liar. He has repeatedly said he wants to
"internationalize" the game, but then seeks to move its first
international franchise.

 >> Stay informed about: No DC Move - No Anti-Trust Benefits 
Back to top
Login to vote
John Smith

External


Since: May 25, 2004
Posts: 55



(Msg. 3) Posted: Mon Aug 09, 2004 10:13 pm
Post subject: Re: No DC Move - No Anti-Trust Benefits [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Dear Mr Hammock:


> The problem is very simple.

Actually its not all that simple. The solution is simple.

> You've put yourself in the back pocket of Orioles owner Peter Angelos.
> There's no denying it.

Hmmm.. I don't think he's in Angelos back pocket as much as the fact that
he is scared by him. Not that he would eventually lose, but rather out of
fear of having to defend in a long and drawn out bit of litigation.


So the rational thinker would say it's now time
> to disqualify yourself as Commissioner of Baseball from having
> anything to do with the decision to move the Montreal Expos to a new
> city. Just as a Judge with conflict of interest would do, you need to
> step aside.

I don't think that he has a conflict on this issue. (Mind you, I think he
did have a big conflict on the Twins contraction issue and he is a horrible
commissioner).

>
> Step aside now. Before the Owner's Meeting in Philadelphia in
> mid-August. How a team owner became Commish is suspect to begin with.

Because the job of the Commissioner is to protect the owners. What better
lap dog than one of the owners.

>
> Why not have baseball's greatest ambassador, Tommy Lasorda, take on
> the CoB position?

Because its not a PR position. Mind you, a trained monkey would make less
mistakes... but that's not the point.

>Why not a successful businessman like Peter
> Uberroth?

The third worst commissioner in the history of the game?

My suggestion, a soon to be unemployed ex-owner of the Texas Rangers...

> Here's the incentive to step aside. If the relocation cmte. doesn't
> decide to move the Expos to Washington, DC, then I'm fully prepared to
> launch an all out campaign to have the US Senate open hearings to
> remove Baseball's Anti-trust protection.

Sigh. The US Congress has too many important things to do right now. I
am all for DC baseball and believe that the owners have been abusive... but
Congress doesn't (or at least shouldn't) have the time to deal with this...
since they haven't had time to engage in Campaign Finance reform or any
other crucial reforms..

> Since you are obviously in
> collusion on so many issues, from ticket prices, revenue sharing and
> player salaries, maybe it's time we hold a magnifying glass to the
> inner workings of MLB!

Yup.
 >> Stay informed about: No DC Move - No Anti-Trust Benefits 
Back to top
Login to vote
no_other

External


Since: Jan 11, 2004
Posts: 16



(Msg. 4) Posted: Fri Aug 20, 2004 8:45 pm
Post subject: Re: No DC Move - No Anti-Trust Benefits [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

standingupinahammock.DeleteThis@yahoo.com (StandingUpInAHammock) wrote in message news:<e270393c.0408091344.381bdaf3.DeleteThis@posting.google.com>...
> Dear Mr. Selig,
>
> The problem is very simple.

And so are the three possible solutions:
- move the Expos to Brooklyn
- leave the Expos in Montreal and live with it
- fold the Expos

>
> Why not have baseball's greatest ambassador, Tommy Lasorda, take on
> the CoB position? Why not a successful businessman like Peter
> Uberroth? How about a reformer who's not afraid to take action when
> needed, like Arnold Swartzenegger? (OK, just kidding, but you get the
> idea!)

How about Jeff Loria? Or Bob Irsay? Or President Junior
Cheeseburger?

> Here's the incentive to step aside. If the relocation cmte. doesn't
> decide to move the Expos to Washington, DC, then I'm fully prepared to
> launch an all out campaign to have the US Senate open hearings to
> remove Baseball's Anti-trust protection. Since you are obviously in
> collusion on so many issues, from ticket prices, revenue sharing and
> player salaries, maybe it's time we hold a magnifying glass to the
> inner workings of MLB!

So rather than make a coherent decision you'd rather see them give in
to threats and make baseball even worse??

> Do the best things for Baseball.

Lower the mound another 2 inches, no more DH, computerized ball and
strike calls, all ballparks need to be weird. And Vlad the Cannon
winning the World Series.
 >> Stay informed about: No DC Move - No Anti-Trust Benefits 
Back to top
Login to vote
no_other

External


Since: Jan 11, 2004
Posts: 16



(Msg. 5) Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2004 1:31 pm
Post subject: Re: No DC Move - No Anti-Trust Benefits [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

No DC Move.

State Legislature this week voted to not fund any stadium proposal for
a Washington-based baseball team. Legislatures in Maryland, DC, and
Virgina now have all balked at financing either a Dulles or dowtown DC
stadium. Republicans and Democrats both see it as assanine to
publicly fund a ballpark in the DC area. City of Washington has also
strongly expressed reservations about footing the bill, again, for
some "fly by night millionaires" who want to "appropriate public
funds".

Washington 'owners' hoped to have good news when they got the RFK
people to say they would bar any Virginia group from using RFK. Then
politicians started coming out against any Washington team that would
require public funds.

So now N. Virginia has to use riskier funding methods if they hope to
win, Washington has to start scrambling for a way, any way, to raise
funds.

Norfolk already has a plan and is quietly high-fiving over this week's
developments.

Las Vegas is also quite happy. Both Norfolk and LV meet with Dupuy et
al next week to show why they aren't Washington.

Portland has funding resolved but MLB seems to have left them behind
with Monterrey et al, so in a week Montreal may have to compete with
only Las Vegas and Norfolk for the Expos!
 >> Stay informed about: No DC Move - No Anti-Trust Benefits 
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
   Baseball Forums (Home) -> Montreal Expos All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada) (change)
Page 1 of 1

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]