Am 17.5.2006, CodeThis schrieb:
> Why all the anti-Bud Selug questions and steroids? Sure, Bud Selug
> knew about the steroid abuse ... but why blame him?
>
> Blame the Players Union! The owners tried to get a steroid ban /
> penalty in MLB, but the Union would never allow it. Amazing how the
> media always screws up the facts. So much easier to single out one
> person.
>
> The Players Union should be hung out to dry on this issue. This
> steroid debacle is entirely the Union's fault.
entirely?
Come on.
For one, I don't think the player's union all of a sudden sent out a
flyer saying that members should juice up. I don't know for sure, but
I'd guess that it started with individual players (or perhaps
trainers) trying to get ahead of the game. From bland, corporate
entities like TribCo to win-at-all-costs guys like Steinbrenner, the
owners rewarded (and thus encouraged) the dopesters with fat
contracts. TribCo, the Cardinals' owners, and Selig were only too
happy to have those late ninties 'roid romps. I don't recall anyone
asking Marky Mark or Sammy to stop juicing.
In fact, the owners were especially happy to have juicing the player's
responsibility. All they had to do was sit back and reap the
benefits. If and when someone got busted, the owners could simply say
"we didn't ask them to do that". Well, maybe not, but since athletes
have to compete for their jobs, once performing enhancing drugs get
into a sport, almost everyone has to use them.
The union's position is to protect its members on-the-job interests.
If its members are dopesters, well, then it's going to protect
dopesters. However, drugs are also a worker safety issue, and the
union should therefore have an interest in ridding the sport of
steroids.
Everyone comes off bad in this story: owners, players, union, writers,
TV -- even the fans.
--
Barutan Seijin -- barutanseijin.RemoveThis@gmail.com
>> Stay informed about: Barry Bonds Hall of Fame Voting