Welcome to BaseballBoardz.com!
FAQFAQ   SearchSearch      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log in/Register/PasswordLog in/Register/Password

118

 
   Baseball Forums (Home) -> Cincinnati Reds RSS
Related Topics:
Still think it was Narron? - on the DL, with an MRI so it looks like it might be worse than the beat guys thought earlier in the week. That's bad enough. The absolute worse news is that his callup is none other than..... wait for

Who will be first Red traded? - OK the Reds are in the cellar and that usually means dumping salary so who will be the first to go? I say either or Weathers. Scott can play 1st or DH and Weathers could be a 7 or 8th inning guy for another team.

Stratton - I was watching the minor league allstar game, and they showed Rob Stratton winning the HR contest. He's out of bball, but it seems that they allow former guys to come and give the HR contest a go. I'd never seen him before. He's a Big Boy. It's..

Bailey to Louisville - 7/8/07 - Optioned RHP Homer Bailey to Triple-A and recalled INF Pedro Lopez from

Pete Pete Pete! - So with Narron at the helm, this team failed 6 times in a row to win a series. Then Mackanin comes in and you win the first one and sweep the 2nd. Big or I've noticed that he puts together a decent lineup (no..
Next:  Cincinnati Reds: Lineup  
Author Message
RJA

External


Since: Jun 12, 2006
Posts: 889



(Msg. 1) Posted: Fri May 09, 2008 7:47 pm
Post subject: 118
Archived from groups: alt>sports>baseball>cinci-reds (more info?)

We haven't covered this yet. On Wednesday, with a 9-run lead, Dusty let
Volquez come out in the 7th having thrown 94 pitches. He finished the 7th
having thrown 118. Is that wrong?

 >> Stay informed about: 118 
Back to top
Login to vote
Orange J. Dood

External


Since: Apr 09, 2008
Posts: 21



(Msg. 2) Posted: Sat May 10, 2008 5:08 am
Post subject: Re: 118 [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Who lives in a pineapple under the sea, "RJA"
<rja RemoveThis @nospam.cinci.rr.com>?

> We haven't covered this yet. On Wednesday, with a 9-run lead,
> Dusty let Volquez come out in the 7th having thrown 94 pitches.
> He finished the 7th having thrown 118. Is that wrong?

He said he stretched Volquez out an extra inning because the bullpen
was depleted. Mercker went on the DL, Bray is back up now.

--
Cheers,
--Jeff
Let's Go Orange!

 >> Stay informed about: 118 
Back to top
Login to vote
David Short

External


Since: Apr 20, 2005
Posts: 201



(Msg. 3) Posted: Sat May 10, 2008 7:52 am
Post subject: Re: 118 [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Orange J. Dood" <no_this_isnt.TakeThisOut@my_email.com>
> Who lives in a pineapple under the sea, "RJA"
>
>> We haven't covered this yet. On Wednesday, with a 9-run lead,
>> Dusty let Volquez come out in the 7th having thrown 94 pitches.
>> He finished the 7th having thrown 118. Is that wrong?
>
> He said he stretched Volquez out an extra inning because the bullpen
> was depleted. Mercker went on the DL, Bray is back up now.

One of the advantages of having your relief pitchers go multiple innings
regularly is that you can use a guy for a three inning save in a game like
this. The reds have had the oportunity to do that a couple of times and they
refuse. Instead they let the starting pitcher go 7 and bring in two guys to
finish blow outs.

All that aside, Volquez toughest inning was probably the 7th. He was
laboring at that point and that's exactly what you don't want to see. The
fact that his slot was supposed to lead off the bottom of the inning (they
were gonna pinch hit for him anyway) makes the decision to leave him in
there worse.

dfs
 >> Stay informed about: 118 
Back to top
Login to vote
Orange J. Dood

External


Since: Apr 09, 2008
Posts: 21



(Msg. 4) Posted: Sat May 10, 2008 9:06 am
Post subject: Re: 118 [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Who lives in a pineapple under the sea, "David Short"
<David.No.Short.DeleteThis@Spam.Wright.Please.Edu>?

> "Orange J. Dood" <no_this_isnt.DeleteThis@my_email.com>
>> Who lives in a pineapple under the sea, "RJA"
>>
>>> We haven't covered this yet. On Wednesday, with a 9-run lead,
>>> Dusty let Volquez come out in the 7th having thrown 94
>>> pitches. He finished the 7th having thrown 118. Is that
>>> wrong?
>>
>> He said he stretched Volquez out an extra inning because the
>> bullpen was depleted. Mercker went on the DL, Bray is back up
>> now.
>
> One of the advantages of having your relief pitchers go multiple
> innings regularly is that you can use a guy for a three inning
> save in a game like this. The reds have had the oportunity to do
> that a couple of times and they refuse. Instead they let the
> starting pitcher go 7 and bring in two guys to finish blow outs.
>
> All that aside, Volquez toughest inning was probably the 7th. He
> was laboring at that point and that's exactly what you don't
> want to see. The fact that his slot was supposed to lead off the
> bottom of the inning (they were gonna pinch hit for him anyway)
> makes the decision to leave him in there worse.

Kerry Wood, anyone?

--
Cheers,
--Jeff
Let's Go Orange!
 >> Stay informed about: 118 
Back to top
Login to vote
RJA

External


Since: Jun 12, 2006
Posts: 889



(Msg. 5) Posted: Sat May 10, 2008 9:41 am
Post subject: Re: 118 [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Orange J. Dood" <no_this_isnt.DeleteThis@my_email.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9A9A344604492Clockwork@72.52.237.249...
> Who lives in a pineapple under the sea, "RJA"
> <rja.DeleteThis@nospam.cinci.rr.com>?
>
>> We haven't covered this yet. On Wednesday, with a 9-run lead,
>> Dusty let Volquez come out in the 7th having thrown 94 pitches.
>> He finished the 7th having thrown 118. Is that wrong?
>
> He said he stretched Volquez out an extra inning because the bullpen
> was depleted. Mercker went on the DL, Bray is back up now.

I read that, but Josh Fogg was available.
 >> Stay informed about: 118 
Back to top
Login to vote
Orange J. Dood

External


Since: Apr 09, 2008
Posts: 21



(Msg. 6) Posted: Sat May 10, 2008 4:34 pm
Post subject: Re: 118 [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Who lives in a pineapple under the sea, "RJA"
<rja DeleteThis @nospam.cinci.rr.com>?

> "Orange J. Dood" <no_this_isnt DeleteThis @my_email.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns9A9A344604492Clockwork@72.52.237.249...
>> Who lives in a pineapple under the sea, "RJA"
>> <rja DeleteThis @nospam.cinci.rr.com>?
>>
>>> We haven't covered this yet. On Wednesday, with a 9-run lead,
>>> Dusty let Volquez come out in the 7th having thrown 94
>>> pitches. He finished the 7th having thrown 118. Is that
>>> wrong?
>>
>> He said he stretched Volquez out an extra inning because the
>> bullpen was depleted. Mercker went on the DL, Bray is back up
>> now.
>
> I read that, but Josh Fogg was available.

Exactly Wink

--
Cheers,
--Jeff
Let's Go Orange!
 >> Stay informed about: 118 
Back to top
Login to vote
Mr. K

External


Since: Jun 07, 2004
Posts: 24



(Msg. 7) Posted: Tue May 13, 2008 10:24 pm
Post subject: Re: 118 [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"RJA" <rja.DeleteThis@nospam.cinci.rr.com> wrote in message
news:4824e280$0$3370$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
> We haven't covered this yet. On Wednesday, with a 9-run lead, Dusty let
> Volquez come out in the 7th having thrown 94 pitches. He finished the 7th
> having thrown 118. Is that wrong?

LOL. Pitch counts are the most overblown stat in the world.

Seriously. As if throwing 118 pitches is really any worse than throwing
100.

I wonder how many pitches Nolan Ryan averaged in the 70s???
 >> Stay informed about: 118 
Back to top
Login to vote
JustTom

External


Since: Dec 16, 2005
Posts: 414



(Msg. 8) Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 2:28 pm
Post subject: Re: 118 [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Fri, 9 May 2008 19:47:27 -0400, "RJA" <rja RemoveThis @nospam.cinci.rr.com>
wrote:

>We haven't covered this yet. On Wednesday, with a 9-run lead, Dusty let
>Volquez come out in the 7th having thrown 94 pitches. He finished the 7th
>having thrown 118. Is that wrong?
>
>

Yes, on so many levels.

OTOH, Arroyo probably wishes he had stayed in for 200 last night.
 >> Stay informed about: 118 
Back to top
Login to vote
RJA

External


Since: Jun 12, 2006
Posts: 889



(Msg. 9) Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 7:46 pm
Post subject: Re: 118 [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Dan Szymborski" <dan.DeleteThis@baseballprimer.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.22955e9ea3a1863b98971e@news-server.woh.rr.com...
> In article <_9qdnWYjrMrn67fVnZ2dnUVZ_uudnZ2d.DeleteThis@comcast.com>,
> mkersting.DeleteThis@comcast.net says...
>>
>> "RJA" <rja.DeleteThis@nospam.cinci.rr.com> wrote in message
>> news:4824e280$0$3370$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
>> > We haven't covered this yet. On Wednesday, with a 9-run lead, Dusty
>> > let
>> > Volquez come out in the 7th having thrown 94 pitches. He finished the
>> > 7th
>> > having thrown 118. Is that wrong?
>>
>> LOL. Pitch counts are the most overblown stat in the world.
>>
>> Seriously. As if throwing 118 pitches is really any worse than throwing
>> 100.
>>
>> I wonder how many pitches Nolan Ryan averaged in the 70s???
>
> As if Ryan was the typical pitcher. It's like saying cancer isn't bad
> because look at Lance Armstrong.
>
> Hard-and-fast pitch count rules are silly, but pitches are *always* a
> concern. Arms are fragile, pitchers are expensive, and the injury rate
> among pitchers in the top 10 of innings in a given season is roughly
> *half* that of what it was 40 years ago.

Wait, what? The injury rate now is half, or did you mean double? You seem
to be going in 2 different directions there after saying arms are fragile
and pitchers are expensive.
 >> Stay informed about: 118 
Back to top
Login to vote
Dan Szymborski

External


Since: Apr 06, 2005
Posts: 622



(Msg. 10) Posted: Fri May 16, 2008 8:46 am
Post subject: Re: 118 [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

In article <482ccb47$0$30217$4c368faf@roadrunner.com>,
rja RemoveThis @nospam.cinci.rr.com says...
> "Dan Szymborski" <dan RemoveThis @baseballprimer.com> wrote in message
> news:MPG.22955e9ea3a1863b98971e@news-server.woh.rr.com...
> > In article <_9qdnWYjrMrn67fVnZ2dnUVZ_uudnZ2d RemoveThis @comcast.com>,
> > mkersting RemoveThis @comcast.net says...
> >>
> >> "RJA" <rja RemoveThis @nospam.cinci.rr.com> wrote in message
> >> news:4824e280$0$3370$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
> >> > We haven't covered this yet. On Wednesday, with a 9-run lead, Dusty
> >> > let
> >> > Volquez come out in the 7th having thrown 94 pitches. He finished the
> >> > 7th
> >> > having thrown 118. Is that wrong?
> >>
> >> LOL. Pitch counts are the most overblown stat in the world.
> >>
> >> Seriously. As if throwing 118 pitches is really any worse than throwing
> >> 100.
> >>
> >> I wonder how many pitches Nolan Ryan averaged in the 70s???
> >
> > As if Ryan was the typical pitcher. It's like saying cancer isn't bad
> > because look at Lance Armstrong.
> >
> > Hard-and-fast pitch count rules are silly, but pitches are *always* a
> > concern. Arms are fragile, pitchers are expensive, and the injury rate
> > among pitchers in the top 10 of innings in a given season is roughly
> > *half* that of what it was 40 years ago.
>
> Wait, what? The injury rate now is half, or did you mean double? You seem
> to be going in 2 different directions there after saying arms are fragile
> and pitchers are expensive.

No, the injury rate is roughly half, most likely because teams are
protecting them more. Arms have always been fragile and pitchers are
bigger investments than they used to be.

--
Dan Szymborski
dan RemoveThis @baseballprimer.REMOVE.com

"A critic who refuses to attack what is bad is
not a whole-hearted supporter of what is good."
- Robert Schumann
 >> Stay informed about: 118 
Back to top
Login to vote
Ron Johnson

External


Since: May 03, 2007
Posts: 328



(Msg. 11) Posted: Fri May 16, 2008 8:53 am
Post subject: Re: 118 [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On May 14, 1:24 am, "Mr. K" <mkerst... DeleteThis @comcast.net> wrote:
> "RJA" <r... DeleteThis @nospam.cinci.rr.com> wrote in message
>
> news:4824e280$0$3370$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
>
> > We haven't covered this yet. On Wednesday, with a 9-run lead, Dusty let
> > Volquez come out in the 7th having thrown 94 pitches. He finished the 7th
> > having thrown 118. Is that wrong?
>
> LOL. Pitch counts are the most overblown stat in the world.
>
> Seriously. As if throwing 118 pitches is really any worse than throwing
> 100.
>
> I wonder how many pitches Nolan Ryan averaged in the 70s???

I'd estimate just over 140 in 1977 and just under 140
in 1974. (The pitch count estimator I use has a standard
error of something like two)

Establishing what Ryan could do in his prime as the standard makes
roughly
as much sense to me as demanding that all players steal bases like
Vince
Coleman in his prime. Unique gifts.

Besides, Ryan was put on a pitch count when he went to the Astros.
(Doubt
this? Take a look at the drop in his complete games) One of the first
pitchers
I was aware of to have one. (The Dodgers *tracked* pitch counts, but
didn't impose any limitations on their pitchers)

Bob Feller peaked at around 135. Gibson at about 120. (And it's worth
noting that Gibson never pitched in a pure 4 man rotation and seems
to have been given an extra day off from time to time after some
really heavy use)

The highest pitch count that we can document is a 15 inning complete
game loss by Al Jackson. 215 pitches. And we know of a Joe Hatten
start that went 211 pitches. Koufax topped out at 205. (Actually
that's
not true. We have pitch counts from a game before called strikes.
Jim Creighton -- the game's biggest star -- threw 331 pitches through
5 complete innings (96 in the second inning alone). Creighton was dead
at 22, so that shows you just how dangerous this kind of pitch count
is)

These are the highest we can document, but there have to be games
with more. Earl Weaver saw Steve Dalkowski pitch a 14 inning complete
game and estimated that Dalkowski threw 280 pitches (and was throwing
as hard at the end of the game as the start), and what we know of
Dalkowski's control (and he had good command that day -- only 17
walks),
well 20 pitches an inning isn't a high estimate.

Nolan Ryan had to have been close to 250 pitches on June 14, 1974.

Ran out of gas after 13 innings. 8 hits, 10 walks and 19 Ks. 58
batters
faced.)

Mind you, the opposing starter (Luis Tiant) took a complete game loss,
but probably threw "only" about 200 pitches. (Faced two fewer batters
despite going an inning and 1/3 longer and only had 5 K and 4 BB.

There's a great Bill James quote on establishing a pitcher's workload.


"Higuera, I suspect, is one of the half-dozen pitchers in our
generation who can work eight or ten innings a start without being
destroyed by it. The way that managers have tested the limits of
starting pitchers for the last century is quite a bit like the way
they used to test for witches, by pond dunking. You ever read about
that? If a woman (or a person, usually a woman) was suspected of
being a witch, they'd tie her to a pole and dunk her in the pond. If
she survived for several minutes underwater, then she was a witch and
should be stoned or burned at the stake or whatever. If she drowned,
then you knew she was innocent. Of course, the woman was dead, but at
least you knew where you stood with her.

That's how managers used to test starting pitchers, and to some
extent still do -- just throw them out there and let them pitch. In
each generation there are a handful of pitchers who can start
thirty-five or forty times a year and pitch seven innings a start -- a
handful, but no more than a handful. If you try that and it ruins the
pitcher's arm, then you know he's not one of those pitchers. Managers
establish as a normal workload the workload that Jack Morris and Teddy
Higuera are capable of handling, but which destroys most pitchers in a
year or two. They're a little better about it now, but there are
still an awful lot of young pitchers whose arms are ruined by managers
who are under pressure to win now, and who don't see any point in
making sure that the pitcher isn't overloaded."

Ironically, he wrote it in 1988 -- the last year Higuera made 30
starts or pitched 180 innings. Apparently even he wasn't one of the
handful...
 >> Stay informed about: 118 
Back to top
Login to vote
Ron Johnson

External


Since: May 03, 2007
Posts: 328



(Msg. 12) Posted: Fri May 16, 2008 11:31 am
Post subject: Re: 118 [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On May 16, 1:07 pm, David Short
<David.no.Sh....TakeThisOut@Spam.Wright.Please.edu> wrote:

>
> I often wondered if being so publicly wrong so often was one of the
> reasons he stoped publishing the yearly annuals. I'm sure they were a
> ton of work and there are a lot of folk who picked up where he left off.

There were a couple of reasons. The biggest one was a bunch of clashes
with his publisher -- primarily having to do with them wanting the
manuscript so early that he didn't feel he could do the required
research. Apparently he is well known in the publishing world as
a "difficult" author.

But "Gold Mine" is basically the old Abstract. He and Dewan have
said that if it sells well enough they'll do another one next year.
And that they'll play it by ear. (You can get most of the essays
at billjamesonline.net Yeah, pay site, but dirt cheap.)

He's never been terribly sensitive about being wrong. For
example consider his move away from range factor in
evaluating defense.

Quoting from the New Historical Abstract:

"Let me say this before we go any further: I am as much responsible
for the spread of poor and inaccurate defensive rating schemes as
anyone in the world. [...] That which I now denounce as
"traditional," I am as much as anyone responsible for creating."
(Well he and Pete Palmer)
 >> Stay informed about: 118 
Back to top
Login to vote
David Short

External


Since: May 21, 2007
Posts: 256



(Msg. 13) Posted: Fri May 16, 2008 1:07 pm
Post subject: Re: 118 [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Ron Johnson wrote:
> There's a great Bill James quote on establishing a pitcher's workload.
>
>
snip a very well reasoned bit about why Teddy Higuera is a good risk to
pitch a lot of innings.

> Ironically, he wrote it in 1988 -- the last year Higuera made 30
> starts or pitched 180 innings. Apparently even he wasn't one of the
> handful...

There are a couple of those. My favorite is the one about the Cleveland
Indians letting Gregg Swindell go after the 1991 season. The poor
Indians were the "canary in the coal mine" that dropped dead proving
that mlb had finally reached the rarefied salary level where small
market teams just couldn't possible afford to pay a star anymore.

Swindell had exactly one good year left in him as a starting pitcher.
The Indians did OK during the 90's for a team that was on the verge of
extinction.

I often wondered if being so publicly wrong so often was one of the
reasons he stoped publishing the yearly annuals. I'm sure they were a
ton of work and there are a lot of folk who picked up where he left off.

dfs
 >> Stay informed about: 118 
Back to top
Login to vote
Kevin McClave

External


Since: Dec 07, 2006
Posts: 364



(Msg. 14) Posted: Fri May 16, 2008 2:06 pm
Post subject: Re: 118 [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Fri, 16 May 2008 13:07:03 -0400, David Short
<David.no.Short RemoveThis @Spam.Wright.Please.edu> wrote:

>Ron Johnson wrote:
>> There's a great Bill James quote on establishing a pitcher's workload.
>>
>>
>snip a very well reasoned bit about why Teddy Higuera is a good risk to
>pitch a lot of innings.
>
>> Ironically, he wrote it in 1988 -- the last year Higuera made 30
>> starts or pitched 180 innings. Apparently even he wasn't one of the
>> handful...
>
>There are a couple of those. My favorite is the one about the Cleveland
>Indians letting Gregg Swindell go after the 1991 season. The poor
>Indians were the "canary in the coal mine" that dropped dead proving
>that mlb had finally reached the rarefied salary level where small
>market teams just couldn't possible afford to pay a star anymore.
>
>Swindell had exactly one good year left in him as a starting pitcher.
>The Indians did OK during the 90's for a team that was on the verge of
>extinction.

And we got it. I remember being so psyched about that trade that made
him a Red.

******************************************************************
Kevin McClave

"To justify himself, each relies on
the other's crime." ~Albert Camus
******************************************************************
 >> Stay informed about: 118 
Back to top
Login to vote
Ron Johnson

External


Since: May 03, 2007
Posts: 328



(Msg. 15) Posted: Wed May 21, 2008 9:40 am
Post subject: Re: 118 [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On May 16, 8:46 am, Dan Szymborski <d... RemoveThis @baseballprimer.com> wrote:
> In article <482ccb47$0$30217$4c368...@roadrunner.com>,
> r... RemoveThis @nospam.cinci.rr.com says...
>
>
>
> > "Dan Szymborski" <d... RemoveThis @baseballprimer.com> wrote in message
> >news:MPG.22955e9ea3a1863b98971e@news-server.woh.rr.com...
> > > In article <_9qdnWYjrMrn67fVnZ2dnUVZ_uudn... RemoveThis @comcast.com>,
> > > mkerst... RemoveThis @comcast.net says...
>
> > >> "RJA" <r... RemoveThis @nospam.cinci.rr.com> wrote in message
> > >>news:4824e280$0$3370$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
> > >> > We haven't covered this yet. On Wednesday, with a 9-run lead, Dusty
> > >> > let
> > >> > Volquez come out in the 7th having thrown 94 pitches. He finished the
> > >> > 7th
> > >> > having thrown 118. Is that wrong?
>
> > >> LOL. Pitch counts are the most overblown stat in the world.
>
> > >> Seriously. As if throwing 118 pitches is really any worse than throwing
> > >> 100.
>
> > >> I wonder how many pitches Nolan Ryan averaged in the 70s???
>
> > > As if Ryan was the typical pitcher. It's like saying cancer isn't bad
> > > because look at Lance Armstrong.
>
> > > Hard-and-fast pitch count rules are silly, but pitches are *always* a
> > > concern. Arms are fragile, pitchers are expensive, and the injury rate
> > > among pitchers in the top 10 of innings in a given season is roughly
> > > *half* that of what it was 40 years ago.
>
> > Wait, what? The injury rate now is half, or did you mean double? You seem
> > to be going in 2 different directions there after saying arms are fragile
> > and pitchers are expensive.
>
> No, the injury rate is roughly half, most likely because teams are
> protecting them more. Arms have always been fragile and pitchers are
> bigger investments than they used to be.

One interesting example that sums up the change. In 1966
the Dodgers had Koufax throwing complete games in spring
training.

They wanted to know if his arm miseries had made him "just a
seven inning pitcher"

Imagine how a team would treat a superstar pitcher who had
arm issues. If they pitched him at all in spring training
it would be for maybe three innings and then wait to
see how his arm reacted.

And if all they could get from him is 7 great innings
every fifth day, they'd take it and be happy.
 >> Stay informed about: 118 
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
   Baseball Forums (Home) -> Cincinnati Reds All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada) (change)
Page 1 of 1

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]